|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-18-2017, 12:51 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
|
|
11-09-2018, 10:55 AM | #14 (permalink) | |||
the bantering battleaxe
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Cute Post Malone's mom
Posts: 3,394
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-06-2018, 03:11 AM | #15 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: U.S.
Posts: 109
|
I think Oasis would sound more dated now than The Smiths would have 10 years ago or than The Smiths would sound now. Oasis mimicked classic rock with a huge, bombastic sound (I am a fan) + they left out all those long jam sessions mid-song. They wore their influences on their sleeves, while The Smiths created a sound. While Oasis may have encouraged many to pick up guitars, The Smiths influences can be heard in both Interpol and The Editors, and I'm sure countless others 10 years ago and now.
Last edited by Karengirl; 12-06-2018 at 03:21 AM. Reason: Deleted a sentence. |
02-11-2019, 09:07 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 6
|
I don't think there's much comparison between these two bands. Oasis has a few hits that have stood the test of time but the Smiths just seem to get better with age. The Smiths were pioneers and their sound is unique. The Smiths are simply amazing.
|
|