|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-23-2015, 03:09 PM | #81 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
|
Quote:
Some of Johnny Marr's riffs are sure harder to tackle than anything done by David Gilmour or Jimmy Page. |
|
10-03-2015, 07:20 AM | #82 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
I'd have to say no as well. I never missed listening to them. I'd go for Blur instead |
|
10-06-2015, 05:32 AM | #87 (permalink) | |
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Haven't listened to anything past their first two albums, but I'd rock them before anything Blur ever did. The latter might be a more creative band, but Oasis released two of the greatest power pop albums of all time ("alternative" is only applied to them due to their time period as far as I'm concerned).
"Rock and Roll Star" "What's the Story (Morning Glory)" are all that is good in life.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-28-2015, 05:37 PM | #88 (permalink) | |
[REDACTED]
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: East of West
Posts: 994
|
Quote:
|
|
11-28-2015, 07:46 PM | #89 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
|
Well I liked them both but Blur was always more of a pop band to me, while Oasis was clearly rock.
Neither of them can hold a candle to the 70's greats like Floyd & Zeppelin, but both were good for their time, and personally I would rather sit down and listen to Oasis greatest hits than Pearl Jam's. |
11-28-2015, 07:53 PM | #90 (permalink) |
[REDACTED]
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: East of West
Posts: 994
|
^^^
Its not that I don't like Blur. I just believe that Oasis is for sure worth a listen, more so than blur. I, on the other hand, would rather listen to Pearl Jam over Oasis though. Probably my fault for overplaying Whats the Story Morning Glory and Definitely Maybe. |
|