yeah sure whatever, It's just my opinion.

Too bad something like this isn't really up for debate. If you'd said "Grohl's voice has no character to it and doesn't sound special, I prefer Cobain" that would be an opinion. Saying "Cobain is a stronger vocalist than Grohl" isn't an opinion, that's a statement that's either true or false and in this case it's very false. It's not even up for debate as to who the more superior vocalist is. You don't need to comment on every single thing someone posts, especially if your comment is completely useless/incorrect.

... that was the original reason of my post.. shoulda checked farther on for newer subjects :/

@sweet_nothing- you do realize you dont have to argue EVERYTHING EVERYONE says....

Really? I thought it was the other way around.

He doesn't count though.

And my comment wasn't aimed at yours , It was just a general observation.

I dont completely understand how nirvana came up with the foo fighters... im having a bit of trouble making a connection.. could someone sum it up real quick :P

Nirvana=Kurt Cobain
Foo Fighters=Dave Grohl

They are both overated Rock bands. I think that links them better!

Can you tell me how Nirvana is overrated?

Nirvana were heralded as the best rock band in a long time. Musically they were original and in Kurt Kobain they had an original voice amidst the pap that was around at the time. Guess what..it's all balls. They are an average rock/alternative band that happened to feature a guy who blew his brains out.