|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-15-2009, 04:01 PM | #351 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: trapped in a basement
Posts: 184
|
Yeah, but we're talking influence here. Radiohead has definitely influenced groups that came out of the 90's/00's. Muse is probably the most obvious. But their influence hasn't been as far-reaching or as lasting as the Pixies. Radiohead is without a doubt a very influential force, but the Pixies really set the pace. I could easily be proven wrong, and I'm waiting for people to chime in with points that I hadn't anticipated, but I still feel like the Pixies were a massive inspirational pressence.
|
10-15-2009, 04:16 PM | #352 (permalink) | |
eat the masters
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,470
|
Quote:
__________________
Last.FM |
|
10-15-2009, 05:11 PM | #353 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: England
Posts: 121
|
I'd say Radiohead probably are slightly more influential worldwide than Pixies, mainly because they've got more albums out. Don't think it's really that important though.
Also, Muse are nowhere close to having the same impact on music as Pixies or Radiohead. Or several other 90's and 00's acts for that matter (The Strokes, Weezer, Blur, Oasis, Pavement, Coldplay to name a very small portion).
__________________
Last.FM |
10-16-2009, 12:47 PM | #356 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: trapped in a basement
Posts: 184
|
No worries, Grotesque Head.
You bring up a good point though. Radiohead did spark a lot of worldwide creativity, whereas I was focusing mainly on the progression of American rock in the 90's and 00's. |
10-19-2009, 10:02 AM | #357 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 942
|
Quote:
|
|
10-19-2009, 03:00 PM | #358 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: trapped in a basement
Posts: 184
|
Absolutely, and you're right about Radiohead. They've got longevity on their side.
R.E.M. definitely had a huge influencial pressence in the 90s, but their's was more generic. Buck and Stipe definitely carried on in the Jagger Richards, dual-leading man tradition (and I certainly prefer that duo to Bono and The Edge), and they filled the roles well, but Oasis, in my opinion, really propelled alternative rock to new heights. There was an endless deluge of pop-rock bands following in the tradition of Oasis after they'd exploded, both here in the States and abroad. I mean, you can still hear their influence in the pop/rock stuff on the radio today. But they layed the foundation for pop balladeers--The Pixies set the rules for the underdog groups that eventually came up through the charts... |
10-19-2009, 03:44 PM | #359 (permalink) | |
eat the masters
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,470
|
Quote:
__________________
Last.FM |
|
10-19-2009, 05:55 PM | #360 (permalink) | |
Himself
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Leuven ,Belgium, via Ireland
Posts: 1,325
|
Quote:
Firstly,I fail to see how Oasis' music fits into "alternative rock" at all.Lyrically and sonically it has nothing in common whatsoever with the post-punk from which alternative rock stems, and if anything they're a traditionalist rock band.The template for contemporary pop balladeers was set by Jeff Buckley on Grace and Radiohead on The Bends, with most groups that followed cloning their synthesis of electric and acoustic structures. Pixies did not set the rules for "underdog" groups.The Nirvana loud/quiet loud template is descended from them, but Pixies themselves were very heavily influenced by Husker Du in terms of songcraft, and loud/quiet/loud was deployed by British post-punk groups that followed in Gang Of Four's wake. The main impact of Pixies is that they were, along with REM, what blazed a trail for the huge commercial success of Alternative Rock by suceeding where the Replacements and Husker Du had failed in crossing over to a mainstream audience and proving the commercial viability of the music. |
|
|