The Libertines (rock, album, fan, hendrix, solo) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Indie & Alternative
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2008, 06:06 PM   #91 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
And irritating scruffy no talent smack heads too?
In your eyes who exactly is talented? If you believe Pete Doherty has no talent, facetious as you may have been when you said that, then you've got serious delusions. Even before he became an 'irritating scruffy no talent smack head' he was an extremely bright student and had won competitions because of his poetry. Does that not constitute as talented?
blainey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 06:08 PM   #92 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Serious delusions?

I've HEARD a Babyshambles album. They sound like nothing more than a pub band with a pissed singer.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 06:13 PM   #93 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14
Default

As an example, I find Bjork's music irritating, completely self-indulgent and pointless. I can still admit she has talent, however much I dislike her music.

Can I state that I think Pete Doherty is a complete prick who is abusing his copious amounts of talent, but that's the point, he still does have talent. How you could deny that after reading his lyrics and poetry is bewildering.
blainey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 07:10 PM   #94 (permalink)
Diskobox
 
Lizzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blainey View Post
If you read the above post and still think Alex Turner writes better songs then Pete Doherty than you're retarded or an AM fan boy. High school poetry students can write with more meaning then Alex Turner.
Lyicly, Alex Turner doesn't really compare to Pete Doherty
However, consistancy wise, the Arctic Monkeys are a far stronger band then the Libs
__________________
white and black, are you looking for the sun boy?
the sun doesn't shine down here, no, not in the shadow
Lizzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 07:11 PM   #95 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blainey View Post
As an example, I find Bjork's music irritating, completely self-indulgent and pointless. I can still admit she has talent, however much I dislike her music.

Can I state that I think Pete Doherty is a complete prick who is abusing his copious amounts of talent, but that's the point, he still does have talent. How you could deny that after reading his lyrics and poetry is bewildering.
Because his lyrics and poetry aren't good.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 07:12 PM   #96 (permalink)
Da Hiphopopotamus
 
sweet_nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lizzie View Post
Lyicly, Alex Turner doesn't really compare to Pete Doherty
However, consistancy wise, the Arctic Monkeys are a far stronger band then the Libs
And the Shins are better than the Artic Monkeys. I started this thread to talk about the Libs not make fun of Pete's drug problem or his lyrics. If your not a fan than don't post.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
America does folk, hardcore and mathrock better and that's 90% of what I give 2 shits on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartsengrafs View Post
sweet nothing openly flaunts the fact that he is merely the empty shell of an even more unadmirable member. his loneliness and need for attention bleeds through every letter he types. edit: i would just like to add that i'm ashamed that he's from texas. surely you didn't grow up in texas, did you sweet nothing?
sweet_nothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 01:30 AM   #97 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blainey View Post
If you read the above post and still think Alex Turner writes better songs then Pete Doherty than you're retarded or an AM fan boy. High school poetry students can write with more meaning then Alex Turner.
Yeah. See, like, you might find this difficult to understand, but the intention of Turner's lyrics is not really to be "deep" and "meaningful". It's supposed to be entertaining and humorous.

I'm not an AM fan-bwoi. Cripes, I haven't listened to them in almost a year. But I can't avoid the need to point out that there IS a difference between Turner and somebody like Doherty. See, Alex Turner knows his limits. He has no grand pretentions about being a poet or some important cultural figure. He knows what he CAN do well, and sticks to his strengths. Pete on the other hand is this complete twonk who tries to be "relevant". *chuckle*. Poet my rear-end. Pete's writings have no political significance nor are they particularly insightful in terms of social commentary. In fact they're the typical bland issues that people have been talking about for years.

What irritates me the most about Libs fan-bwois - which is actually what you are, btw (loz, the irony!) - is that they are in no position to be thinking so highly of Doherty! The guy can hardly play his instrument; he evidently knows almost nothing about that whole songcraft thingee which is often kinda important to making good music; and then, when it comes to the one thing he does know how to do (i.e. lyrics), he's not even that good. He's hit and miss. Sometimes winners, sometimes duds - but almost never culturally significant! This guy isn't a musician. This guy isn't a 21st century Keats. He's a complete chaotic mess of an individual, about as much worth being idolized as he is being in a band with - which, suffice to say, is not very much at all.
Rainard Jalen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 03:06 AM   #98 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
Yeah. See, like, you might find this difficult to understand, but the intention of Turner's lyrics is not really to be "deep" and "meaningful". It's supposed to be entertaining and humorous.

I'm not an AM fan-bwoi. Cripes, I haven't listened to them in almost a year. But I can't avoid the need to point out that there IS a difference between Turner and somebody like Doherty. See, Alex Turner knows his limits. He has no grand pretentions about being a poet or some important cultural figure. He knows what he CAN do well, and sticks to his strengths. Pete on the other hand is this complete twonk who tries to be "relevant". *chuckle*. Poet my rear-end. Pete's writings have no political significance nor are they particularly insightful in terms of social commentary. In fact they're the typical bland issues that people have been talking about for years.

What irritates me the most about Libs fan-bwois - which is actually what you are, btw (loz, the irony!) - is that they are in no position to be thinking so highly of Doherty! The guy can hardly play his instrument; he evidently knows almost nothing about that whole songcraft thingee which is often kinda important to making good music; and then, when it comes to the one thing he does know how to do (i.e. lyrics), he's not even that good. He's hit and miss. Sometimes winners, sometimes duds - but almost never culturally significant! This guy isn't a musician. This guy isn't a 21st century Keats. He's a complete chaotic mess of an individual, about as much worth being idolized as he is being in a band with - which, suffice to say, is not very much at all.
I agree, Pete is a terrible musician. I agree, the majority of his output doesn’t deserve anywhere near the coverage it receives. No, I don’t think he is a significant poet and not much of his stuff compares to actual acclaimed poets. Maybe if you had of actually read the thread before you ran your keyboard you would of seen I was responding to claims he has no talent and that Alex Turner has “more talent in his fingernails.”

And have you actually listened to any sort of amount of his discography? Obviously not, because you have missed a common theme in many of his songs about racism, poverty, domestic oppression and police violence. I don’t think Pete Doherty is anywhere near as good as what he is made out to be, but it just pisses me that people feel the need to hijack any thread about him to proclaim his lack of ability. It shouldn’t be too difficult to comprehend that some people may see some artistic value in his music.
blainey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 11:31 AM   #99 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Nobody is hijacking anything.

This is a thread to discuss The Libertines , not a thread to hero worship Pete Doherty.

I do love it how some people seem to think he's some sort of genius. As if the very notion that releasing one OKish album in 2002 and nothing else of any interest makes you one.

Look out Hendrix , Zappa , Bowie , Morrissey ... Pete's gonna show you what a real genius is
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 12:48 PM   #100 (permalink)
Da Hiphopopotamus
 
sweet_nothing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
Default

Do you think Pete and Carl will get back together. And is it just me or did they seem kindof romanticly involved with one another.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by swim View Post
America does folk, hardcore and mathrock better and that's 90% of what I give 2 shits on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartsengrafs View Post
sweet nothing openly flaunts the fact that he is merely the empty shell of an even more unadmirable member. his loneliness and need for attention bleeds through every letter he types. edit: i would just like to add that i'm ashamed that he's from texas. surely you didn't grow up in texas, did you sweet nothing?
sweet_nothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.