lol, Im at work and cant watch youtube videos. I have a feeling its of exactly what I said lol. *facepalms self*.

I like Woods a lot more than wavves. I have the split they did together.

i listened to wavves again last night, I dont understand how they are so popular or hyped. I really can't get into their stuff. even their most popular song so bored was pretty boring. I was reading a quote about the way he makes his music and he was pretty much saying, if it wasnt for the way he recorded it, the music sounds like ****ty stereotypical pop.

That applies to a large amount of indie.

if thtas true, then i sadly can't respect them as musicians. I bet a lot of bands suck live if thats true.

You've just answered your own question there.

haha true

People dont like Wavves for their textured, epic works of art, it's disposable, trashy and raw as - and thats why people like it. Whether their music is boring or not is just down to every individual listeners personal tastes i guess.

Using the word 'epic' to describe Wavves' music strikes me as quite funny (I won't get into 'textured' but I don't think it's an apt description either). How is it epic? If anything I thought they were going for anti-epic.

... did you actually read anything other than the first 5-10 words of my post? Im saying people dont listen to Wavves to be engulfed in a wave of texture and mood, they listen to Wavves because it's fun, disposable and in your face music. The abrasive, trashy nature of it appeals to certain listeners.

I read the whole thing. Although somehow I overlooked your 2nd word (don't) and I thought you were saying that people like Wavves because they find it epic and textured as well as abrasive and trashy. Oops