|
Register | Blogging ![]() |
Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Rate and discuss Dig, Lazarus, Dig by Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds | |||
Excellent |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 26.44% |
Very Good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
38 | 43.68% |
Average |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 18.39% |
Poor |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 3.45% |
Awful |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 8.05% |
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools
![]() |
Display Modes
![]() |
|
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
|
![]() Quote:
I don`t deny he had potential , but he never fulfilled it. I think it`s unfair to say that someone COULD have been better than someone else if they were never around to prove that they were .Nick Cave has been putting out top quality albums for over 25 years both with the Birthday Party & his own stuff, there are not many bands that can say that. I can`t think of a single dip in quality throughout his whole career. To suggest that Jeff Buckley is better on the strength of one album , of which he didn`t even write around a third of it just seems a bit stupid to me. And that is why I think Nick Cave is better than Jeff Buckley.Plus I think Nick Cave has a much more expressive & distinctive voice. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|