jeff buckley = genius

Sneer · 12-27-2004, 09:05 AM

hatemonger name on other individual who has/had a better voice than buckley? thats why he is distinguished now- because he could sing like no other, and contrary to what you somehow believe, yes it was one album, but for that particular sub-genre it was an amazing album. yes he covered a couple of songs, but he made them 10 times better.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 12-27-2004, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LedZepStu

hatemonger name on other individual who has/had a better voice than buckley?

Nick Cave

franscar · 12-27-2004, 11:39 AM

Behave yourself now lad. You're talking silly.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 12-27-2004, 01:10 PM

I don`t think so

I think he`s much more diverse & a much better songwriter. Also personally I think he`s much better at creating an atmosphere in his songs much better than Buckley does.
I don`t think singing a couple of ballads nicely makes you a great singer.

franscar · 12-27-2004, 03:11 PM

What about having a voice that shimmers with emotion and possessing a range that Nick Cave could only dream of?

Urban Hat€monger ? · 12-27-2004, 03:18 PM

Range isn`t everything , Mariah Carey has one of the best vocal ranges in music, but releases piss poor pop records.

I never said Jeff Buckley isn`t good , I just suggested I don`t think he`s great.
Personally I would rather listen to Nick Cave than Jeff Buckley. You can say all you like that he only made one album & had lots of potential , but he was never around to show it.

For the record I think if he did have the chance to put out more albums they would have been a hell of a lot better than Grace , and thats one of the reasons I don`t think it`s a great album.

12-27-2004, 09:05 AM	#21 (permalink)
Sneer Let it drip Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 5,430	hatemonger name on other individual who has/had a better voice than buckley? thats why he is distinguished now- because he could sing like no other, and contrary to what you somehow believe, yes it was one album, but for that particular sub-genre it was an amazing album. yes he covered a couple of songs, but he made them 10 times better. __________________ LastFM Sneer's Emporium of Sound Fright Team radio show

12-27-2004, 11:39 AM	#23 (permalink)
franscar Honky Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Birmingham Posts: 665	Behave yourself now lad. You're talking silly.

12-27-2004, 01:10 PM	#24 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	I don`t think so I think he`s much more diverse & a much better songwriter. Also personally I think he`s much better at creating an atmosphere in his songs much better than Buckley does. I don`t think singing a couple of ballads nicely makes you a great singer.

12-27-2004, 03:11 PM	#25 (permalink)
franscar Honky Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Birmingham Posts: 665	What about having a voice that shimmers with emotion and possessing a range that Nick Cave could only dream of?

12-27-2004, 03:18 PM	#26 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	Range isn`t everything , Mariah Carey has one of the best vocal ranges in music, but releases piss poor pop records. I never said Jeff Buckley isn`t good , I just suggested I don`t think he`s great. Personally I would rather listen to Nick Cave than Jeff Buckley. You can say all you like that he only made one album & had lots of potential , but he was never around to show it. For the record I think if he did have the chance to put out more albums they would have been a hell of a lot better than Grace , and thats one of the reasons I don`t think it`s a great album.