Mgmt - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Indie & Alternative
Mgmt Mgmt
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
Page 6 of 31 « First 45 6 7816 Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-10-2008, 01:43 PM   #51 (permalink)
Groupie
 
rebkranz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 44
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu View Post
Off topic i know.. but Brad Sprengel or whatever has the greatest avator ever. End of.
For real... I love how it says to ban him.
__________________
I only listen to music that doesn't exist yet.
rebkranz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 03:54 PM   #52 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
This_Is_Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 63
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Stengel View Post
These guys blow live.

One of those bands where I like two or three songs, yet have no desire to pick up a full length. Call it 'musical intuition'-the ability to differentiate between a band who can pull off a full length, and one that can't. Judging by the majority of comments, I appear to be correct.
I read an interview and the intervierer asked them why they suck live and they said they brought up a good point. They're young and getting alot of publicity. Everyone expects them to have it all figured out, but there still working out all the kinks in live shows and everything.

That being said they do suck live.
__________________
My Face!
This_Is_Corey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 04:41 PM   #53 (permalink)
Groupie
 
rebkranz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 44
Wink
Quote:
Originally Posted by This_Is_Corey View Post
I read an interview and the intervierer asked them why they suck live and they said they brought up a good point. They're young and getting alot of publicity. Everyone expects them to have it all figured out, but there still working out all the kinks in live shows and everything.

That being said they do suck live.
hahahahah, I have a theory that any electronic band will seriously suck live. Who wants to hear a computer perform? Now, I do think some of their album is not electronic, actually worth listening to, and not all exactly like Time To Pretend, Electric Feel and Kids. Those of you who said you only listened to part of the album, I assume heard those, as they are the popular ones. But, again, I gotta go with my electronic bands should be heard on an album with their friendly computers making it pretty. Save concerts for real musicians. (too harsh?)

OK, I just realized that Radiohead HAS to be excluded from my statement, for reasons obvious to us all.
__________________
I only listen to music that doesn't exist yet.
rebkranz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 06:12 PM   #54 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Alkajazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: OKAYSEA
Posts: 50
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebkranz View Post
OK, I just realized that Radiohead HAS to be excluded from my statement, for reasons obvious to us all.
Nine Inch nails? Depeche Mode?
Alkajazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 06:30 PM   #55 (permalink)
Later on...
 
FireInCairo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,235
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebkranz View Post
hahahahah, I have a theory that any electronic band will seriously suck live. Who wants to hear a computer perform? Now, I do think some of their album is not electronic, actually worth listening to, and not all exactly like Time To Pretend, Electric Feel and Kids. Those of you who said you only listened to part of the album, I assume heard those, as they are the popular ones. But, again, I gotta go with my electronic bands should be heard on an album with their friendly computers making it pretty. Save concerts for real musicians. (too harsh?)

Too much of a broad statement
but I'd say it's largely true
However, I am in an electronic music act...and we ****ing rock live.
__________________
O G MUDBONE: Only You can prevent forest fires.
FireInCairo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 06:35 PM   #56 (permalink)
Pepper Emergency!
 
Strummer521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 493
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebkranz View Post
Save concerts for real musicians. (too harsh?)
Well...a lot of electronic bands use keyboards, which are conventional instruments, obviously, so wouldn't the keyboard player be included in what you mean by "real musicians"? And isn't a musician just someone who creates music?
__________________
"Caffeine is so ridiculous right now."
RZA
Strummer521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 11:58 PM   #57 (permalink)
Self Reliant Independent
 
the_dp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 181
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebkranz View Post
hahahahah, I have a theory that any electronic band will seriously suck live. Who wants to hear a computer perform? Now, I do think some of their album is not electronic, actually worth listening to, and not all exactly like Time To Pretend, Electric Feel and Kids. Those of you who said you only listened to part of the album, I assume heard those, as they are the popular ones. But, again, I gotta go with my electronic bands should be heard on an album with their friendly computers making it pretty. Save concerts for real musicians. (too harsh?)
I just posted this about an electronic band that was great live: Delta Fiasco. I also would submit that M83 was insanely good in concert.
the_dp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2008, 12:03 AM   #58 (permalink)
you wouldn't like me
 
pianokeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 114
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebkranz View Post
hahahahah, I have a theory that any electronic band will seriously suck live. Who wants to hear a computer perform?
It's true that an extensive amount of electronic acts use conventional instruments in their performances. I've seen a ton of great 'electronic' acts live - ones that employ electric dumkits, traditional kits, guitars, bass, keyboards, and vocals. So you can't just suggest that as a blanket statement all electronic bands are terrible live. I've been to some pretty rad electronic shows.
pianokeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2008, 12:35 AM   #59 (permalink)
Later on...
 
FireInCairo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,235
Default
you can't issue a blanket statement
but he's almost right
about 75% of the electronic acts I see,
(and I see quite a few due to my bands style)
look utterly bored ****less cuase they're just running backing tracks on freakin' ableton
__________________
O G MUDBONE: Only You can prevent forest fires.
FireInCairo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2008, 09:11 PM   #60 (permalink)
Groupie
 
rebkranz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 44
Default
ok, ok, i agree, that may have been too broad, but I still stand by my theory. Depeche, yes, very good live, and NIN, and I'm sure there are others. MGMT is not one.
__________________
I only listen to music that doesn't exist yet.
rebkranz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 6 of 31 « First 45 6 7816 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.