|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-15-2008, 02:54 AM | #42 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
And believe me, we don't have the radio any better than you guys. Only difference is that perhaps one (or two?) major stations are dedicated to Adult Alternative music, and in the UK that includes all the Album Rock lamage us Brits can muster. Eh, there's also a station called XFM. Who are extremely dedicated to playing nothing but ::COUGHcommercially successful::COUGH Indie music. My main criticism is levied a bunch of mindless kids who think they're doing something profound and fascinating by imitating the Libertines, and now all of a sudden, ripping off the Arctic Monkeys. Last edited by Rainard Jalen; 01-15-2008 at 03:42 AM. |
|
01-15-2008, 12:44 PM | #44 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
I'm not that bothered , they're pretty 'armless.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
01-15-2008, 01:34 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dear Old Blighty
Posts: 253
|
Well the way I see it, the fact we're using The Libertines as the last big marker in British Indie is pretty ignorant really. Seeing as The Klaxons gathered a huge amount of media attention last year from the NME, aswell as their album Myths of the Near Future being awarded the Mercury Prize. Not to mention the fact they've spawned new-rave, a genre of questionable existence.
__________________
www.myspace.com/ch3ssclub |
01-15-2008, 02:44 PM | #47 (permalink) |
Slavic gay sauce
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 7,993
|
New rave is a fictional genre supposedly crafted by the Klaxon boys, !!! and Klaxons have very little to do with each other musically...and neither are new rave, really...
__________________
“Think of what a paradise this world would be if men were kind and wise.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle. Last.fm |
01-15-2008, 02:56 PM | #48 (permalink) | ||||
isfckingdead
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
01-15-2008, 03:17 PM | #49 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
The point is a few years ago there were 3 weekly music papers all competing looking for new acts to break , you didn't like the acts one paper wrote about , you simply bought another. Now the NME are the only one around , if you don't like the acts they push , too bad thats all your getting. If the NME don't like you it's tough **** , that's basically all your exposure gone.
Same with Radio 1 , Radio 1 may play the same kind of crap any commercial station does during the day but because it didn't have the limitations of a commercial station during the evening it could break new acts & play music with a minority interest , and people like John Peel & Steve Lamacq did do that. Now that Peel has died & Lamacq has left they replaced them both with some faceless dance DJ & some reject from MTV thus cutting down exposure for new & minority acts down. This happened 3 to 4 years ago and now the result of it is very little of interest getting exposure. You can't cut off 2 of the main ways of getting an audience and expect things to be the same a few years down the line.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
01-15-2008, 05:41 PM | #50 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
The radio point was responding to what you were saying about radio. I had not previously brought up radio in this thread to my knowledge. I'm not interested in it and don't listen to it - except for the routine playlist check from time to time, and that I can do on their websites. As for not knowing much of the scene, I go through all the mags, a hell of a lot of review sites, and get bands recommended to me by people in the scene pretty much on a daily basis. I go on their lousy myspace blogs and listen. I'm not talking from nothing here. You want a long list of useless acts of 2006 to the present date, I'll post'em. Don't see where it gets us exactly. Besides, I MADE THIS THREAD BECAUSE I WANT TO BE DIRECTED TO DECENT ONES. What part of that do you not understand? I'm dismissing what I know and have been exposed to for a long while now. I'm not denying that there's something better. I just want to see what and where it is. You can either help in that regard, or you can keep arguing and trying to look smart. Either way, I'm not interested in those sorts of games. I'm here for a civil discussion. Not a petty argument. Finally, I just noticed this. Like, what the hell? First of all, I'm a Wolf fan. SECONDLY, and more importantly, it wouldn't have proven me wrong. I'm making statements about the general state of the scene. Of course there are good things coming out here and there from time to time. I won't count Wolf simply for the reasons that he's already got 3 albums out and has been active for many years. He's not new in the sense I'd intended. But again, more importantly, even if I count him, it makes no difference to the essence of my claim. Last edited by Rainard Jalen; 01-15-2008 at 05:50 PM. |
|
|