radiohead, best fing since led zep

oasis
 

oasis are better than blur, but i do like blur to but not as much

i prefere blur. WOOOOHOOOO

If your going by hits then oasis are by far the more successful band, they sold more records, have more fans made more money.

Though Blur are easily a better band musically, from there humble beginnings as a Britpop band with albums like Leisure and Modern life is rubbish they have mixed electro-pop, grunge and alt rock, becoming one of the worlds most inventive bands.
Blur had and have more of an original sound whilst Oasis are a popier version of The Stone Roses, and utter products of the Manchester Britrock scene.

Also Blurs albums Leisure, Park life, 13 and Think Tank all albums were huge hits. Oasis really only had what’s the story morning glory as far as albums go.

So I say Blur 100%:)

Blur for originality.

But in all honesty I got more into more of Oasis' songs.

Mind you thats before I realised they'd all been stolen from other bands such as the Beatles.

oasis are the reincarnation of the beatles

Blur by far so much better.but then again i was pratically raised around Oasis cause my brother thinks there amazing

I like Oasis better. I mean, they have kind of declined recently, and they have gotten full of themselves, but at the same time, I think they bought into that whole,"They say we're the best, so we must be the best" mindset. It happened to a lot of bands, but even so, thats what I think happened. But bottom line, I like Oasis better.:hphones:

I know. I was originally fooled by the fact they admitted it, by doing covers such as I am the walrus. I feel so silly.

Oasis was one of the first bands i was ever into....when i was younger my father bought me two of there albums and i wasnt into music at the time at all...but i really enjoyed the albums back then and i still like their music to this day. Blur are pretty good yet there too much over the britpop side for me.
So Oasis gets my vote.