Emo, timeless? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Punk > Hardcore & Emo
Emo, timeless? Emo, timeless?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
Page 4 of 4 « First 23 4
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2005, 07:06 PM   #31 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by LedZepStu
aka the baggy scene, the stone roses are a good example.
Not quite

Shoegazing was a kind of British less grungy grunge

Bands like Chapterhouse , Slowdive , Ride , My Bloody Valentine , Pale Saints , Lush , Drop Nineteens , that sorta thing.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 08:00 PM   #32 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia..
Posts: 42
Default
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog
to say the beatles made music like everything else at the time, its simply an uneducated statement. You don't have to like them, but thats wrong.

Noone said that. Not once. We said that they did inspire some of the bands today, so you CAN give them credit for that.
Ah someone DID say that, Zealious pretty much did when starting this whole debate:
Quote:
They did not pioneer anything new, they were simply making music associated at that time, which sounded like most bands in that age. I'd rather listen to dead emo music
__________________
And I would be there every time you'd need me, I'd be there every time... But for now I'll look so longingly waiting... For you to want me, for you to need me, for you to notice me..
*the1ulove2hate* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 11:28 AM   #33 (permalink)
enchanted.
 
ArtistInTheAmbulance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cornwailles, angleterre.
Posts: 2,537
Default
Ohhhh I see. Sorry, my mistake... Musta slipped past that post *hides head in shame*
__________________
shake your wings like theyre laced with sound!
ArtistInTheAmbulance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 12:19 PM   #34 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 5
Default
I don't think there is a single band that can match the talent, versatility, or originality of the beatles. The beatles can be considered "pop" only because they were popular, which is because they were a great band, but they are not "pop" in the sense that they conformed to the current musical trend in order to sell records. If you look at the beatles albums (all 18 of them) they vary quite diffently, and each is a unique expression of their musical abilities. All the members (- Ringo) could play several instuments and were amazing vocalists. Now this is my opinion, and I agree it is difficult to compare artists of different genres (classic rock, emo) but overall I don't think therer is a band that is as well rounded as the beatles. And yea they were overcommercialized...

Afternoon Delight
Catharsis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2005, 01:08 PM   #35 (permalink)
Skeptic
 
Zealious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 375
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catharsis
I don't think there is a single band that can match the talent, versatility, or originality of the beatles.
Joan of Arc. If you know this band then you'll understand.
Zealious is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 4 of 4 « First 23 4

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.