Most embarrassing Pitchfork review - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-20-2018, 06:16 PM   #19 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adidasss View Post
Absolutely not, in the last 10 years or so their writing has improved dramatically, especially in the last few years with Conde Nast. They have some of the best writers in the bizz now probably. Just check out some of the Sunday specials when they dig up an album from the past that they didn't reveiw (or they'd like to revisit), I learn a lot of stuff from those.
I'm not sure why but I rarely ever take a music review site that seriously. Considering its almost impossible for a reviewer to know how I portray an album. Idk, maybe I just get tired of the same monotonous tasks of reading a review of Kid A for the 1000th time. Just gets old.
Key is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.