|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: How Much Does This Genre Suck? | |||
5 | 2 | 28.57% | |
4 | 0 | 0% | |
3 | 1 | 14.29% | |
2 | 2 | 28.57% | |
1 | 2 | 28.57% | |
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-18-2018, 01:05 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
|
What Sucks About This Genre: Classical Music Edition
Sure, there are many different sub-genres in Classical and we could talk at length about any of them, but let's be general here: you're either into classical or you're not. If you're not, why? What sucks about it?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
07-18-2018, 01:18 PM | #6 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
The biggest issue with classical is that the way classical musicians are typically trained is a method that rewards conformity over creativity.
I guess it's an extension of what I wrote above, but I think that the composer/player dichotomy is whack. 3 suck
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
07-18-2018, 01:30 PM | #7 (permalink) |
Call me Mustard
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
|
There are exceptions such as Ride of the Valkyries, mentioned in the prog thread, but overall, it isn't a genre that excites me all that much. Odd too since I like the use of the form in much of rock (Moody Blues, Left Banke, ELO).
|
07-18-2018, 01:42 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
|
There's actually a good tradition in classical for putting expressive play over boring, mechanical precision, so I think a lot of musicians could learn from that. Not least metal drummers and guitarists.
But I'm supposed to tear the classical down, so... Maybe there's an over reliance on playing the "greats" for the 10.000th time instead of covering more obscure and/or recent material. I guess that's to be expected. People want to hear the famous stuff. I'm bad at this. I don't know enough yet to really have any complaints. A lot of the stuff from 1500 to 1700ish is kinda dull though... I tend to like the religious pieces better when from this time period. The fancy entertainment written for the elites is less amazing. But it's a hugely broad slice of time, so it's bound to be a downright retarded simplification. You don't have to tell me that. |
07-18-2018, 01:54 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
|
Quote:
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|
|