Should Artists Change?

lieu · 03-02-2016, 04:57 AM

yes in any case. it doesn't have to be dramatic, but I don't see the integrity in churning out too much of the same thing

Zhanteimi · 03-03-2016, 03:39 PM

No, no, no, and no.

galt54 · 03-03-2016, 04:04 PM

Good music is good entertainment and vice versa. An example would be the Beatles. And they sure changed over the years. They were good in the beginning and they got still better (for the most part) when they changed.

Key · 03-03-2016, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mordwyr

No, no, no, and no.

Explaining your reasoning is usually helpful.

Machine · 03-03-2016, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mordwyr

No, no, no, and no.

Hm good point, but. Why, why, why, and why?

Also my opinion is of course an artist should change over time, it'd get boring to hear artists do the same goddamn thing over and over and never explore in other areas.

03-02-2016, 04:57 AM	#11 (permalink)
lieu Groupie Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 19	yes in any case. it doesn't have to be dramatic, but I don't see the integrity in churning out too much of the same thing

03-03-2016, 03:39 PM	#12 (permalink)
Zhanteimi Mord Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Tokyo Posts: 4,873	No, no, no, and no.

03-03-2016, 04:04 PM	#13 (permalink)
galt54 Music Addict Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: A suburb of Stockholm, Sweden. Posts: 191	Good music is good entertainment and vice versa. An example would be the Beatles. And they sure changed over the years. They were good in the beginning and they got still better (for the most part) when they changed.