Power Pop That Is Not Called Power Pop But Still Is Power Pop Cause **** You? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-05-2016, 09:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Basil C. Thurston III's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Power pop need not have any kind of restrictive sound. It's just pop that's louder than the Beatles. These qualify...

Some of In Flames' music is just as good as anything Big Star ever put out. .
if you're going to utilize genre titles, or characterize certain sounds, then, yes, you have to be restrictive in sound. Otherwise, using your definition of "pop that's louder than the Beatles", New Kids On The Block is power pop. Everclear is power pop. Alejandro Escovido is power pop. Nope.

As for In Flames, I must have missed their climb to legendary status, the adoration of their song-writing by two generations of artists, and the avid, almost hero-worship following of their fans. But I compliment you for being outrageous.
Basil C. Thurston III is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.