The Wrong Generation Argument, Does it really matter? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2015, 09:40 AM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 39
Default The Wrong Generation Argument, Does it really matter?

Yes, I think music was better because there wasn't as much corporate influence but then again... society hasn't really changed. We haven't radically changed our way of life, we've had computers yes; we treat other races differently yes but what's different about the 50's compared to 2015 except the music?

People often want to be a part of something but then again, there are tons of things you can be a part of; so what if you weren't a part of The Beatles. There will always be a festival or a band that'll grasp it's influence over the world. You don't have to be there or even have met one of the Beatles; all you have to do is take what they provided and make it into your own.

People often want to seem cool by dejecting the new music; I do admit that the new music isn't as appealing but that's only because of laziness. People don't put as much effort into things to create a unique sound that sticks within people's minds; they take electronics for granted. Electronics can do amazing things, so can guitars and pianos. Even dubstep can sound incredible if certain people thought outside the box. I think the music people have assumed that people don't even care anymore; that is incorrect. I think the musicians need to realize that it's effort that causes people to like musicians.

Also people need to find better ways of being cool, be yourself; don't follow. The Wrong Generation isn't even original anymore, it's more like a bulletin point for defining yourself.

I'm waiting for the point in time where things suddenly change and we wouldn't have this corporate saturated era but alas, we have The Wrong Generation.

Also those who focus on the whole "digital sales going up, CD sales going down" are not looking at the whole picture. Whole picture being licensing deals for older artists, promotion to get the word out, radio control (including YouTube, Pandora, Spotify) and indie label distribution. I get that they make things easier but take ever Bandcamp artist that should be more popular then they are; it would be much easier if we didn't have this major label stuff.
ZRFTS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 12:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
Hello!
 
Jade_City's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: corner by Jamal's house
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZRFTS View Post
Yes, I think music was better because there wasn't as much corporate influence but then again... society hasn't really changed. We haven't radically changed our way of life, we've had computers yes; we treat other races differently yes but what's different about the 50's compared to 2015 except the music?

People often want to be a part of something but then again, there are tons of things you can be a part of; so what if you weren't a part of The Beatles. There will always be a festival or a band that'll grasp it's influence over the world. You don't have to be there or even have met one of the Beatles; all you have to do is take what they provided and make it into your own.

People often want to seem cool by dejecting the new music; I do admit that the new music isn't as appealing but that's only because of laziness. People don't put as much effort into things to create a unique sound that sticks within people's minds; they take electronics for granted. Electronics can do amazing things, so can guitars and pianos. Even dubstep can sound incredible if certain people thought outside the box. I think the music people have assumed that people don't even care anymore; that is incorrect. I think the musicians need to realize that it's effort that causes people to like musicians.

Also people need to find better ways of being cool, be yourself; don't follow. The Wrong Generation isn't even original anymore, it's more like a bulletin point for defining yourself.

I'm waiting for the point in time where things suddenly change and we wouldn't have this corporate saturated era but alas, we have The Wrong Generation.

Also those who focus on the whole "digital sales going up, CD sales going down" are not looking at the whole picture. Whole picture being licensing deals for older artists, promotion to get the word out, radio control (including YouTube, Pandora, Spotify) and indie label distribution. I get that they make things easier but take ever Bandcamp artist that should be more popular then they are; it would be much easier if we didn't have this major label stuff.
Oh look, another person who has no idea what the hell they're saying.
__________________
WHERE DID YOU GET THAT THING?

FROM THE MOTHERSHIP!
Jade_City is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 12:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

I tend to only care about my opinion if I'm the first one to have that opinion. Instead of saying I'm from the wrong generation I say I'm from the wrong planet.

Oh wait: Sun Ra - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 07:03 PM   #4 (permalink)
jiojoijoi
 
grtwhtgrvty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 398
Default

This is such an ignorant thread.

This generation is more DIY than any of the other generations. This is literally the generation where the mainstream corporations have the least influence and the least draw. Back in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, the corporations and record labels decided who became famous, what you heard, what became famous, etc.

Now we have kickstarter. We have DIY. We have DAWs. We have platforms for people to express and promote themsleves.

You are so ****ing beyond ignorant. I am so tired of coming onto this forum and having to correct someone who thinks this exact thing. Every single day there is someone new making this identical thread and I just don't have the energy to write an essay as to why they are wrong so I'm just going to say flat out that you are wrong and you are out of touch and you have no idea what you are talking about even remotely.

Why do so many of you speak without even remotely thinking? Why do you have opinions that aren't even remotely based in logic or reality or any level of rationality whatsoever. Literally how do you even draw these conclusions?

The mainstream hasn't changed at all. The alternative, experimental scene has only gotten bigger, and over time, pushed the mainstream further and further into irrelevancy. It's so blatantly obvious and I have no idea why so many of you need to have this spelled out for you to understand it.

Educate yourself before you make threads so you don't end up looking stupid.

You think society hasn't changed but society has changed, drastically, and the methods that we express fringe art has changed drastically. You're delusional if you think that music in the 60s/70s/etc wasn't corporate as ****. It was way more corporate than it is now, that's 100% for sure.

Last edited by grtwhtgrvty; 05-24-2015 at 07:12 PM.
grtwhtgrvty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 07:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty View Post
This is such an ignorant thread.

This generation is more DIY than any of the other generations. This is literally the generation where the mainstream corporations have the least influence and the least draw. Back in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, the corporations and record labels decided who became famous, what you heard, what became famous, etc.

Now we have kickstarter. We have DIY. We have DAWs. We have platforms for people to express and promote themsleves.

You are so ****ing beyond ignorant. I am so tired of coming onto this forum and having to correct someone who thinks this exact thing. Every single day there is someone new making this identical thread and I just don't have the energy to write an essay as to why they are wrong so I'm just going to say flat out that you are wrong and you are out of touch and you have no idea what you are talking about even remotely.

Why do so many of you speak without even remotely thinking? Why do you have opinions that aren't even remotely based in logic or reality or any level of rationality whatsoever. Literally how do you even draw these conclusions?

The mainstream hasn't changed at all. The alternative, experimental scene has only gotten bigger, and over time, pushed the mainstream further and further into irrelevancy. It's so blatantly obvious and I have no idea why so many of you need to have this spelled out for you to understand it.

Educate yourself before you make threads so you don't end up looking stupid.

You think society hasn't changed but society has changed, drastically, and the methods that we express fringe art has changed drastically. You're delusional if you think that music in the 60s/70s/etc wasn't corporate as ****. It was way more corporate than it is now, that's 100% for sure.
Knock it off with the insults. Argue with points being made, don't engage in personal attacks.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 07:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
jiojoijoi
 
grtwhtgrvty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Knock it off with the insults. Argue with points being made, don't engage in personal attacks.
http://www.musicbanter.com/general-m...lain-me-4.html
grtwhtgrvty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 07:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty View Post
Thanks for the random page link. Now knock it off with the insults.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 07:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
jiojoijoi
 
grtwhtgrvty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Thanks for the random page link. Now knock it off with the insults.
Wasn't random.

I'm pointing out your hypocrisy and disregarding the pointlessness of your post, continuing as I was regardless of what you say.
grtwhtgrvty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2015, 06:18 AM   #9 (permalink)
moon lake inc.
 
Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,125
Default

Real simple answer: music is more interesting now than it has ever been. So no the argument dosent matter.
Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 12:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Wrinkled Magazine
 
Aux-In's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: In Time
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZRFTS View Post
People often want to seem cool by dejecting the new music;
Yes, they do. If a person really enjoys music, then it's nothing more than "I don't want to." There's nothing wrong with that. Where the rub comes in is when they try to tell me there's no good music being made or that no one's had any talent since the mid-20th century, as if talent exists in a time vacuum.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZRFTS View Post
I do admit that the new music isn't as appealing but that's only because of laziness.
Laziness is a part of it, sure, although that can be an oversimplification of the resistance. I also think that rejecting new music is a natural reaction to anything foreign. Any new activity takes effort to acclimate to if you want to pull yourself out of your comfort zone. If you haven't met someone before, you need time to feel out what kind of person they are. If you've never bungee jumped before, you're probably going to need time to feel it out. If you've never heard dubstep before, then, well, brace for impact. It takes effort, time, and a lot of patience to bring in new influences, let alone experiment with new musical sounds as a non-musician listener. Unless you're really into music, why bother?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZRFTS View Post
People don't put as much effort into things to create a unique sound that sticks within people's minds
I have found tons of new songs that to me stick in my mind, but it's just my personal taste. No one is obligated to care about new music.

Quote:
People often want to seem cool by dejecting the new music; I do admit that the new music isn't as appealing but that's only because of laziness. People don't put as much effort into things to create a unique sound that sticks within people's minds; they take electronics for granted. Electronics can do amazing things, so can guitars and pianos. Even dubstep can sound incredible if certain people thought outside the box. I think the music people have assumed that people don't even care anymore; that is incorrect. I think the musicians need to realize that it's effort that causes people to like musicians
I don't hear anyone complaining about how electric guitars changed rock and roll, yet somehow that gets a pass from people who criticize technological advancements in music. I've largely stopped trying to convince people that there is still good music being made. Just so we make sure the pot meets the kettle here, I, myself at times, need convincing that good hard rock is still being made .

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZRFTS View Post
Also those who focus on the whole "digital sales going up, CD sales going down" are not looking at the whole picture. Whole picture being licensing deals for older artists, promotion to get the word out, radio control (including YouTube, Pandora, Spotify) and indie label distribution. I get that they make things easier but take ever Bandcamp artist that should be more popular then they are; it would be much easier if we didn't have this major label stuff.
It's more interesting to me to read what someone on MB says about a band, click on the video, and see for myself. This, rather than some paid radio guy playing what he's told to play. I love the new system. It allows me to support a modern artist that wouldn't have been given the time of day on a major or even indie label under the old gatekeeper system. Not so much on this site, but on other music boards I've seen, it amazes me how many people there are on them who don't seem to enjoy music at all -- unless it's their music, which is, of course, sacrosanct.

Another point that I would like to make is that a lot of artists are bad at self-promotion, which is why they benefited from labels back then. I'm still surprised with how easy it is to spread music that a lot of artists haven't made their music directly available on those channels: YouTube, Bandcamp, Soundcloud, iTunes, etc. But maybe it's like a Sting quote I remember, which I will paraphrase: "I am an artist, not a businessman."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Machine View Post
Real simple answer: music is more interesting now than it has ever been. So no the argument dosent matter.
Yes. I heard this kind of thing a lot growing up: "Such and such an artist, book, appropriate cultural norm, etc., is good and/or crap." One of the things you learn when you get into the real world is that what people used to tell you was good [music, books, culture...] was really nothing more than their opinion.
__________________
Reviews l YouTube Playlist: Another Dimension

"All over a bowl of bitter beans."
Aux-In is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.