|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-24-2014, 04:38 PM | #11 (permalink) | |
moon lake inc.
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
I hate using the different kinds of expiremental music sometimes it all gets so muddled I usually just go with avant-garde, or expiremental. |
|
11-24-2014, 04:45 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,366
|
This reminds me, there's also useful genres with really stupid or odd names. How the hell did singer songwriter and indie turn into genres?
How are R&B and contemperary R&B even in the same genre? Easycore? What kind of name for a genre is that? Also, how the hell is k pop and j pop a seperate genre? The country where it comes from is..the country where it comes from. I know the sound can be different, But that shouldn't be in the genre, the country is a seperate thing. Whats next, Afghanistan pop? |
11-24-2014, 05:36 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
I especially hate the ones that have more to do with the fashion of the bands that the music itself.
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
11-24-2014, 05:37 PM | #15 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
So is Colin Stetson whale minimalism?
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
11-24-2014, 07:06 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
Engorged Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,536
|
Quote:
One subgenre that I think has failed to split off into something more descriptive is post-rock. Initially it separated bands that used rock instruments in more inventive ways than traditional, such as Stereolab for example. Electronics were also a big part of the mix. Then post-rock was adopted for bands playing moody, atmospheric instrumental rock. Now you can't even call Stereolab post-rock because people will think they're atmospheric instrumental rock. And many of those bands aren't really experimenting or doing anything particularly innovative. It's fucking atmospheric instrumental rock! Why don't we have such a genre? There are many more recent bands that I think the label post-rock would apply to, but because they're not instrumental atmospheric rock, I don't and neither does anyone else. On RYM, there are hundreds of metal subgenres and sub-subgenres yet we don't have anything to separate stuff that was originally called post-rock from the more recent post-rock. If anything, people have retroactively started calling original post-rock indietronica, which I think is bullshit. No genre name should end with an 'a' anyway.
__________________
last.fm | my collection on RYM | vinyl instagram @allthatyouseeandhear I'd love to see your signature/links too, but the huge and obnoxious ones have caused me to block all signatures. |
|
11-24-2014, 09:35 PM | #19 (permalink) | |
moon lake inc.
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,125
|
Quote:
|
|
11-24-2014, 09:40 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: livin wild
Posts: 2,179
|
yeah theres like 2 completely separate parts of post-rock. the early Slint, Dirty Three, Tortoise, Talk Talk, etc (in fact you could probably separate this even further). and the crescendocore post-rock Godspeed, Explosions, Mogwai, etc.
I heard someone compare Godspeed to Pearl Jam in that they basically ruined a genre (unintentionally of course) by breeding a bunch of knockoffs that took over. Kinda seems right. |
|