Icon vs Legend (subjective or objective terms?) Which one is more enduring? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Icon vs Legend (subjective or objective terms?) Which one is more enduring? Icon vs Legend (subjective or objective terms?) Which one is more enduring?
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-24-2014, 07:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulflower View Post
I have provided a ton of reasons for why Janet is an Icon.
No. You've provided your reasons for why you think she is an icon.

She had some really good years there for a while and Rhythm Nation was a pretty important album to a segment when it was released but JJ is not an icon in the truest sense of the word IMO.

Her bother is an icon though.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.