The thin line between Rock and Electronica - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2014, 08:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Madda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Italy
Posts: 46
Default The thin line between Rock and Electronica

Have you ever noticed how many bands and artists with a Rock background have been employing more and more electronic sounds and vice versa? I realized this the other day, while posting in the review of Radiohead's OK Computer, here in Music Banter.
What do you think about this mixture of two completely different genres?
In your opinion, when does an artist stop being part of the Rock scene and start being part of the electronic scene and viceversa?
Use bands and musicians as examples, if you want.
I mean, with certain bands it's easy: even if Muse use synthesizers and made one or two pseudo-dubstep songs, they're clearly rooted in Rock culture. But it's not that easy with stuff such as MGMT, Chemical Brothers, Primal Scream, Stateless, Gorillaz and so on (or even with older stuff such as David Bowie.. or with my fellow italians Trabant and My Awesome Mixtape, but I think that nobody knows them outside Italy ahah). They are really far from both Jimi Hendrix and Burial, to name respectively a "pure" Rock guitarist and a Future Garage producer and DJ.
These questions are not related to the music itself. I don't wanna start a debate on whether they suck or not. It's more about the cultural side. Do you consider bands like these part of the Rock culture or part of the electronic culture?

P.S. I have the bad feeling that I made a lot of errors or that I haven't been clear. I'm not english... so, feel free to correct me or to ask for clarifications

Last edited by Madda; 10-28-2014 at 08:44 PM.
Madda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2014, 09:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

I like the politically charged industrial/electronic side-project of James Fogarty.
The Bombs Of Enduring Freedom.
Stand Up If Your Brave is a favorite single.

I'm kinda new to this style of music myself, but I do like it a lot. Actually looking forward to what is yet to come in the future concerning this particular style and sound.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 01:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William_the_Bloody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madda View Post
Have you ever noticed how many bands and artists with a Rock background have been employing more and more electronic sounds and vice versa? I realized this the other day, while posting in the review of Radiohead's OK Computer, here in Music Banter.
What do you think about this mixture of two completely different genres?
In your opinion, when does an artist stop being part of the Rock scene and start being part of the electronic scene and viceversa?
Use bands and musicians as examples, if you want.
I mean, with certain bands it's easy: even if Muse use synthesizers and made one or two pseudo-dubstep songs, they're clearly rooted in Rock culture. But it's not that easy with stuff such as MGMT, Chemical Brothers, Primal Scream, Stateless, Gorillaz and so on (or even with older stuff such as David Bowie.. or with my fellow italians Trabant and My Awesome Mixtape, but I think that nobody knows them outside Italy ahah). They are really far from both Jimi Hendrix and Burial, to name respectively a "pure" Rock guitarist and a Future Garage producer and DJ.
These questions are not related to the music itself. I don't wanna start a debate on whether they suck or not. It's more about the cultural side. Do you consider bands like these part of the Rock culture or part of the electronic culture?

P.S. I have the bad feeling that I made a lot of errors or that I haven't been clear. I'm not english... so, feel free to correct me or to ask for clarifications
Yes and I don't mind, I just thinks its the natural evolution of music. The electric guitar isn't considered cutting edge technology anymore, but its still the preferred weapon of choice for many musicians, and its a lot cooler than the synth in my opinion.

The guitar is often run through a lot of pro tool effects or even midi based systems to give it more of an electronic sound, I think its great, because personally I don't think the kids of today have the patience to learn how to play intracrite guitar solos.... either that or the bar has really dropped.

As for more rock or electronic, guess it depends on the band. Editors rock, Vitalic definitely electronic
William_the_Bloody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 10:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

I wouldn't call "electronica" a genre. It's just a way of making music, one can make rock, classical, jazz etc. all with electronic equipment and sounds.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.

Last edited by grindy; 10-31-2014 at 11:07 AM.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 10:57 AM   #5 (permalink)
V8s & 12 Bars
 
EPOCH6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 955
Default

Bands can incorporate elements from both rock culture and electronic culture, no need to exclusively align with one or the other. I think the more you compare rock culture and electronic culture the more you realize the lines aren't really there at all, they never have been, all cultures feed off of each other, whether they're conscious of it or not. You can look at a band like Creedence Clearwater Revival next to Skrillex and say "yes, these are damn near polar opposites stylistically", but the longer you look the more you realize that Skrillex follows rock song structure as much as anyone else, and rock song structures evolved from blues song structures, and blues from something else. The lines are never there, music is just a massive sonic mess remixing itself over and over again. There are obviously attitudes and themes that are more prevalent in one genre than the other but you'll always be able to find commonality if you look hard enough, AC/DC and Deadmau5 aren't as different as we might think. There are no lines, it's everyone ripping off everyone else until you end up with two things that feel very different but grew from the same root.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbycob View Post
There's 3 reason why the Rolling Stones are better. I'm going to list them here. 1. Jimi Hendrix from Rolling Stones was a better guitarist then Jimmy Page 2. The bassist from Rolling Stones isn't dead 3. Rolling Stobes wrote Stairway to Heaven and The Ocean so we all know they are superior here.
EPOCH6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 11:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Madda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Italy
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EPOCH6 View Post
Bands can incorporate elements from both rock culture and electronic culture, no need to exclusively align with one or the other. I think the more you compare rock culture and electronic culture the more you realize the lines aren't really there at all, they never have been, all cultures feed off of each other, whether they're conscious of it or not. You can look at a band like Creedence Clearwater Revival next to Skrillex and say "yes, these are damn near polar opposites stylistically", but the longer you look the more you realize that Skrillex follows rock song structure as much as anyone else, and rock song structures evolved from blues song structures, and blues from something else. The lines are never there, music is just a massive sonic mess remixing itself over and over again. There are obviously attitudes and themes that are more prevalent in one genre than the other but you'll always be able to find commonality if you look hard enough, AC/DC and Deadmau5 aren't as different as we might think. There are no lines, it's everyone ripping off everyone else until you end up with two things that feel very different but grew from the same root.
Exactly what I wanted to hear
Madda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 11:35 AM   #7 (permalink)
Remember the underscore
 
Pet_Sounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The other side
Posts: 2,488
Default

As usual, both EPOCH and grindy nail it.
__________________
Everybody's dying just to get the disease
Pet_Sounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 11:43 AM   #8 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Madda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Italy
Posts: 46
Default



Also, who cares about that when you can listen to this. Maybe I was drunk when I posted that.

Jokes. I was drunk for sure
Madda is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.