|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-04-2014, 08:38 AM | #11 (permalink) |
Aficionado of Fine Filth
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: You don't want to look in there.
Posts: 6,884
|
Not everyone listed here falls into the rock category, but most of them do. With a few exceptions, the majority listed are multimillionaires.
Richest Rock Stars |
08-09-2014, 09:11 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 64
|
Record companies weren't necessarily looking for talent. They had to meet the criteria of what they thought could be a star, or marketable. Also, a super talented person may have zero ambition (aside from being great at their instrument), whereas the less talented person may be extremely ambitious.
|
10-14-2014, 08:36 AM | #13 (permalink) |
Ask me how!
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The States
Posts: 5,354
|
Bands are a product, and companies invest in products they know will make them money. It's a shame, but that's how things are. Local restaurants can be amazing, but they'll never be able to compete with, say, McDonalds. If you go into the industry looking to make exciting and unique music, go for it and don't look back, just don't be surprised when only a small clique knows your name and buys your songs.
|
10-17-2014, 06:12 PM | #14 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
|
Quote:
1. The return on your investment The music industry is about one thing, profit! and country music over the decades has proven to be a safe return on your investment. Country music has a stable fan base in rural America, which reaches a wide age demographic. This fanbase has also endured for decades, so no matter what the latest musical fad is, country music is guaranteed to sell. Punk on the other hand is a youth culture genre which has to compete on the market with other youth culture genres (rap, metal ect) It primarily appeals to a younger age demographic and therefore is susceptible to fads. Popular one day, and not the next. Punks viability as a commercial product peaked in the 90's, and has been on the decline since. It was also a genre born in defiance of the music industry, so its fanbase tends to be outsiders who do not have a lot of $$$. It order for punk to become profitable, it would have to appeal to the wallets of teenage suburbia on a wider scale than rap or metal,....unlikely. 2. Talent Unfortunately with all the sampling and pro tools out there, talent does not mean as much as it once did to record executives, but slumping sales a few years ago has resulted in a shift in the music industry, with the rise of artists who are talented and can actually play their own instruments!!! With this in mind country music is far more sophisticated and talented than punk rock. In my opinion Fat Mike doesn't deserve to be a millionaire... if he's not already. The brand of punk your talking about is very simplistic and easy to play, and therefore becomes boring & redundant to teenagers pretty quick, who then move onto the next fad. So no double standard, just the hard reality, but punk still has a solid underground music following, even if your definition of punk (Anti Flag, The Offspring) translates to pussy punk. |
|
|