|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-25-2014, 02:50 PM | #31 (permalink) | ||||||
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
|
I don't understand people who make bold statements about another artists music but have not listened to their music to make a good judgement. It matters because a person should not be making a judgement about an artist entire discography when they have not listened to the artists entire discography. Quote:
Kelis is an eclectic artist. All her songs do not sound the same. She experiments with alot of different genres. If that is his opinions thats fine.... but listening to five songs from various different albums is not a good judgement of her entire discography. Quote:
Huh? This makes no sense. Can you clarify what you mean by this? He made a bold statement about her as an artist and about her entire discography. Someone who has only listened to 5 songs out of her entire discography should not make bold statements such as that when they have not listened to all of the artists music, period. Quote:
Kelis is not a mainstream artist. She only has two mainstream hits and that is Milkshake and Bossy. I am not asking him to mention unknown songs. He did not even mention albums or an album he listened to. All her albums sound completely different. Quote:
This entire conversation is subjective. Quote:
DJ said that Beyonce's album initial album sells would have still been the same even if JT, Katy and so forth released there album when she did hers. I disagree with that because there is past evidence that shows that she does not sell well when other artists drop there album around the same time she does hers. For example, in 2011 when Adele released her "21" album she out sold everyone INCLUDING Beyonce. In fact Adele's 21 album went diamond! Beyonce does not have a diamond album and Adeles 21 album is still selling till this day Beyonces sales figures that were recently presented by Sound Scan shows that combining all 5 of her albums she has a total of 15 million albums sold. I think this is a very very small number of sells for someone of her status. There are artists that sell 15 million off of one album alone. Her initial sells for her latest album was due to the way she released it not because it was such a great great album with great great music. Her sells have died down though for that album. She is not an artist that sells a lot in terms of albums. She is more so a "singles" artist similar to Rihanna but Rihanna sells more singles. Quote:
A review is not going to say..." This is the best album of 2013 because of the way she released it" but I know that is why she got all those good reviews because the album sucks quality wise. When I have some time I will find some reviews. |
||||||
03-25-2014, 05:58 PM | #32 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
Quote:
You are doing the same thing that you do in arguments about artists not getting enough credit. You bring up the media and it's always based off of your perspective of what the media says. There is no way in hell that you can actually prove anything. You can snatch up a few articles here and there if you want to but there is no way to prove what the overall media says because it's all different sources. You choose to not see all the hate and being dragged through the mud that she gets and make your opinion based off of that when it's not really the case. Quote:
Quote:
Do you also have a problem with her singing about female empowerment? You keep denying that you are slut shaming but that's exactly what you are doing. Women aren't supposed to be proud of their bodies in your eyes. They should be covered from head to toe with dresses that drag across the floor. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
03-25-2014, 08:04 PM | #33 (permalink) | |
Make it so
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
|
Quote:
STOP SLUT SHAMING!!
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
|
|
03-25-2014, 10:15 PM | #34 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
Bowie isn't being snubbed. His digital release just didn't have any impact like Beyonce's did. |
|
03-26-2014, 12:17 AM | #36 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
|
Quote:
I think she acts like a slut on stage and in her videos and I think she purposely capitalizes off of it. Side Note: I am not calling HER a slut specifically (because I do not know her personally) but yes she does act like that on stage and in her music videos. I think that is all she obviously wants to be seen as: "sex symbol" and that is fine I just wish she would present that in a more creative way. Any descent person with self- respect would not display their ass like that in a video or pose half naked in their video just for a quick buck. You can still sell sexuality without doing that and even if you are I just think it should be at least more artistic. For instance, Madonna did the same thing in the 90s but it was artistic and creative. It told a story and had a overall message. I don't see anything wrong selling sexuality but as long as it is done in a creative and artistic way. With Beyonce, its the same old sex kitten act but its not done in a creative or artistic way. It does not tell a story or has deeper meaning behind it. She is suppose to be an artist. She is a singer and even if she wanted to sell sex in all her music I think it should have some artistic merit behind it. Not just her laying half naked on the floor singing "I want to be the kinda girl you like" in every single video. Because to me what that shows is, she is simply capitalizing off a easy money making market (the sex market) in order to compensate for her bland music. Paritian is not about sexual empowerment. I am tired of people making her silly songs deeper than what they are. Are Rihanna sexual songs empowerment as well? How about Miley's? Because I am tired of this double standard with Beyonce. I think the meaning in the song is a negative message especially for young girls and young women. It teaches girls that you have to be submissive to men and that "you should be the kinda girl they like" Really Beyonce? That is all you want to be? I just personally feel like that sends a bad message to this generation especially the females that listen to this crap and think that is what they should be. I especially take that personally since I am apart of this generation Young women think they should show their ass and be the kinda woman MEN want them to be in order to be valued because of silly corporate songs like this not realizing these singers do not give a damn about them and just care about money. ONCE AGAIN, Janelle Monae is a better role model and overall better artist. It is a shame how in order to be successful as a pop female singer you have to show your ass and sell your soul. I am glad that there are some with dignity and self-respect. |
|
03-26-2014, 12:20 AM | #37 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: freely swimmin thru the waters of glory much like a majestic bald eagle soars thru the skies
Posts: 1,463
|
just wanna add i do agree with part of what realtalk has said despite not readin much of this thread. beyonce has always had a weird double standard. act like a sex kitten on stage but is revered for it and is 'empowering' and stuff... lol @ slut shaming
|
03-26-2014, 12:26 AM | #38 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
|
Quote:
Once again, Beyonce had the Superbowl for promotion Beyonce had a world wide tour Beyonce had the pepsi commercials Beyonce singed at the inauguration So she had more commercial promotion than Bowie so naturally she initially would sell more but it does not change that he was the first. I think his sells are more impressive being he had NO promotion AT ALL. |
|
03-26-2014, 12:42 AM | #39 (permalink) | |
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
having singles on the radio and music videos before and album drops counts as promotion for an upcoming album whether you want to acknowledge it or not.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|
03-26-2014, 12:47 AM | #40 (permalink) | |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
|
Quote:
And you think doing the Superbowl, having a world wide tour, having pepsi commercials, singing at the inauguration isn't? Bowie did not release an official date for his albums. He dropped those singles out of the blue. It had been 10 years since he had released an album and he was not in the public eye promoting anything. |
|
|