Grateful dead vs. Phish - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-2013, 03:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 8
Default Grateful dead vs. Phish

I know this is an old debate but i've only ever had it with one die hard phish fan who hated the grateful dead and i am a die hard grateful dead fan who is not a phish fan, he likes to try to compare the two and say phish is better and I don't think there remotely similar, it's like comparing the B 52's with funkadelic. im not saying the grateful dead is better, im just saying there not comparible, am I wrong???
KillerForHire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2013, 07:57 AM   #2 (permalink)
Model Worker
 
Gavin B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,248
Default

I agree that the Grateful Dead in their prime was a far more innovative and groundbreaking band than Phish. Phish simply lacks strength in the songwriting department and can't compete with the Grateful Dead's massive catalog of great songs written by Jerry Garcia & Robert Hunter.

To be fair, Farmhouse (2000) an album which Phish outsourced their songwriting duties to songwriter/keyboardist Tom Marshall is the strongest Phish studio album to date. However many Phish fans revile Farmhouse because it lacks the usual 15 or 20 minute jam songs that are the heart of Phish's live concert repertoire.
__________________
There are two types of music: the first type is the blues and the second type is all the other stuff.
Townes Van Zandt
Gavin B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.