VMAs 2013 - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2013, 11:27 AM   #141 (permalink)
Neo-Maxi-Zoom-Dweebie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 3,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtalk92 View Post
Okay

If that is your opinion so be it. I dont think you have listened to enough Michael Jackson because Justin has a very limited range in comparision to MJ who had a variety of singing styles and a much broader range. I am not calling MJ the best singer in the world but he had a stronger range than JT and was a much better singer. He also displayed emotion in his singing and not as robotic as JT is.

Before Michael Jacksons videos for Thriller, music videos did not have rehearsed choreography or story plots. Yes, He DID innovate and enhance the music video medium which is why that award is named after him.


Awards dont mean anything if their is no merit to speak for the award. Justin could win 60 million choreography awards but if the choreography is not creative or iconic then it means nothing so that was a weak arguement.

MJ won those awards but he actually EARNED those awards and he has the iconic choreography to speak for it.
When you think of Billie Jean, Smooth Criminal, Thriller etc you INSTANTLY you know the choreography for those songs. What choreography that JT has that are iconic???

I can not believe I am comparing these two artists that should not even be compared lol


The comparision is silly to me because JT is not in the same category as MJ which you are ridiculously trying to argue. I think its insulting to MJs talent and all that he had accomplished.


Thriller
Beat It
Smooth Criminal
Moonwalker
Billie Jean
Man In The Mirror
Dirty Diana
BAD
The Way You Make Me Feel
Leave Me Alone
Remember The Time
JAM
Scream


He has a couple more but these are the universal ones.
I actually got bored with Michael Jackson onward from the Man In The Mirror album. Its not like you could avoid his other output though, so I think its safe to say i've heard the majority of his music. And being that i'm classically trained in vocals i'd say my ears are good enough to form an opinion on the subject.

Awards obviously mean something. They are given to people because they were deemed the best at what they do from their peers. How is it a weak argument to point out that they both tallied the same amount of choreography awards? And how was it weak to point out that he co-choreographed on one song and didn't choreograph the other?

As i've said I found Billy Jean to be fairly simple choreography. Thriller was very well done, but he didn't choreograph it by himself so perhaps the other input is what makes it iconic. Smooth Criminal was average also.

I think MJ would have appreciated JT and respected his ability on every level. You dismissing his ability is the laughable part.
FRED HALE SR. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 11:31 AM   #142 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtalk92 View Post
DJ I luv you lol I actually like debating with you because you are one of my favorites here but I disagree with you on this.
yeah I need to apologize about how I come off sometimes lol. When I get into it and get heated then I start to get dismissive. I recognize that.




Quote:
Originally Posted by realtalk92 View Post
I am not ignoring their videos. I dont remember any of their videos and I dont think their videos have made a significant impact on pop culture.

But thats my opinion and if you think other wise so be it.
I will give you a short refresher course on some of his videos since you don't remember any of them.


Spoiler for Solo Justin Timberlake Vids and N'sync:
Cry Me A River


Like I Love You


Rock Your Body


SexyBack


What Goes Around...Comes Around(heavily story related)


Mirrors


Tunnel Vision


Pop


Bye Bye Bye
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 12:29 PM   #143 (permalink)
"Hermione-Lite"
 
Arya Stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York.
Posts: 3,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtalk92 View Post
lol I am a girl
Sorry, I tend to connect people to their avatars but it was rude of me to assume your gender! I apologize!

I love what you said about all the places that MJ has danced because it truly does show how much he has done and it looks AMAZING. he never looks uncomfortable or wrong or weird, he always looks good in those videos you see. JT doesn't to me. But that's not all the award's about, it's about the vids.

Even then, I don't think the videos are so awesome.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sansa Stark View Post
I'm down with Jesus, in that case.


MB Journal.
Azucar y Especia. My blog.
Arya Stark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 02:06 PM   #144 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
I actually got bored with Michael Jackson onward from the Man In The Mirror album. Its not like you could avoid his other output though, so I think its safe to say i've heard the majority of his music. .
I disagree but I can respect that.

I actually thought albums like Dangerous and HIStory had more production sophistication and subject matter. He definitly grew as a songwriter with those albums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
And being that i'm classically trained in vocals i'd say my ears are good enough to form an opinion on the subject.
This comes off rather snobbish.. maybe you didnt mean it this way lol

You can form an opinion because you are entitled to. Being classically trained has nothing to do with your opinion. In other words, it doesnt make your opinion more superior than others because you are classically trained in vocals (which I actually think is cool but really means nothing in this discussion). Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and has something they can contribute whether they are classically trained in music or not.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
Awards obviously mean something.
They only mean something if the artist has the credibility behind it. To be honest, there are alot of artists that I love that havent even won a grammy or only have one grammy. There are alot of legendary artists that dont have alot of awards for whatever reason because alot of politics goes into who wins certain awards so I dont pay attention to awards specifically.

I will say that during Michael Jackson's era awards had more meaning because their was more competition and the industry actually gave the awards to who actually deserved them. Nowadays specifically during JT's era its quite different. Awards are now based off of popularity, politics, fame and money. They are not based on the quality of the music or music video.

So I dont think its good to compare the awards that MJ have versus JT because their awards reflected different things in their era of music.





Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
They are given to people because they were deemed the best at what they do from their peers.
Not necessarily.

I think in todays era of music, awards are based on popularity more than the quality of the music.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
How is it a weak argument to point out that they both tallied the same amount of choreography awards?
For one thing, MJ has more awards than JT and number two, they come from two different eras of music so its unfair to compare their awards. Michael Jackson competed with Prince, Stevie Wonder, Madonna, Whitney Houston, etc. Who did JT compete with?? His competition was very small in comparison.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
And how was it weak to point out that he co-choreographed on one song and didn't choreograph the other?
Because thats irrelevant. MJ was more involved in the production and creation of his videos than JT was. He wasnt just involved in the choregraphy.He wrote the story plot, came up with the themes, direction, actors etc. He also created alot of the choreography. Yes on some videos he had maybe one or two choreographers help but he also created alot of it himself. He also directed alot of videos as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
As i've said I found Billy Jean to be fairly simple choreography.
I wouldnt call standing on the tip of your toes simple lol The average person can not stand on the tip of their toes and do alot of the footwork Michael was doing in the video. I only brought up Billie Jean as an example of an ICONIC music video Michael has. Regardless of how simple you think it is, the video is iconic. The way the floor lights up when MJ dances on it... thats Iconic. I have seen so many references to that video.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
Thriller was very well done, but he didn't choreograph it by himself so perhaps the other input is what makes it iconic. Smooth Criminal was average also.
The point is he was INVOLVED in the creation of his videos and Im sorry Smooth Criminal was FAR from average. It was a EPIC video.
The Lean alone was EPIC.
The Lean alone crushes anything JT has every done LOL hahaha

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR. View Post
I think MJ would have appreciated JT and respected his ability on every level. You dismissing his ability is the laughable part
MJ actually liked Usher and Chris Brown better.

I think Usher is a way better singer and dancer than JT and CB is a better dancer. JT does make better music out of the two but I did like the music Usher was making before he got all Europop.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 02:18 PM   #145 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtalk92 View Post
MJ actually liked Usher and Chris Brown better.
What is this? You talked to him personally and found this out?
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 02:26 PM   #146 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon View Post
yeah I need to apologize about how I come off sometimes lol. When I get into it and get heated then I start to get dismissive. I recognize that.






I will give you a short refresher course on some of his videos since you don't remember any of them.


Spoiler for Solo Justin Timberlake Vids and N'sync:
Cry Me A River


Like I Love You


Rock Your Body


SexyBack


What Goes Around...Comes Around(heavily story related)


Mirrors


Tunnel Vision


Pop


Bye Bye Bye
I think its fair that I apologize as well lol because I can be aggressive when it comes to my music opinions but I dont mean anything by it lol.
I am going to check out these videos when I get some time. I do remember a couple of these videos and songs but dont remember what specifically happens in the videos.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 02:36 PM   #147 (permalink)
Neo-Maxi-Zoom-Dweebie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 3,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtalk92 View Post
I disagree but I can respect that.

I actually thought albums like Dangerous and HIStory had more production sophistication and subject matter. He definitly grew as a songwriter with those albums.

I didn't feel they were better in the least.


This comes off rather snobbish.. maybe you didnt mean it this way lol

No actually you pointed out how Jackson was a better vocalist and obviously I had no clue according to you, thats what really happened.

You can form an opinion because you are entitled to. Being classically trained has nothing to do with your opinion. In other words, it doesnt make your opinion more superior than others because you are classically trained in vocals (which I actually think is cool but really means nothing in this discussion). Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and has something they can contribute whether they are classically trained in music or not.

I can form opinion about anything. Being classically trained doesn't have anything to do with forming an opinion on pop vocals? Sure it does.


They only mean something if the artist has the credibility behind it. To be honest, there are alot of artists that I love that havent even won a grammy or only have one grammy. There are alot of legendary artists that dont have alot of awards for whatever reason because alot of politics goes into who wins certain awards so I dont pay attention to awards specifically.

I will say that during Michael Jackson's era awards had more meaning because their was more competition and the industry actually gave the awards to who actually deserved them. Nowadays specifically during JT's era its quite different. Awards are now based off of popularity, politics, fame and money. They are not based on the quality of the music or music video.

So I dont think its good to compare the awards that MJ have versus JT because their awards reflected different things in their era of music.

So time has changed pop music in a way that the music can't be compared? If you say so.





Not necessarily.

I think in todays era of music, awards are based on popularity more than the quality of the music.

I could say the very same thing about the other era.


For one thing, MJ has more awards than JT and number two, they come from two different eras of music so its unfair to compare their awards. Michael Jackson competed with Prince, Stevie Wonder, Madonna, Whitney Houston, etc. Who did JT compete with?? His competition was very small in comparison.




Because thats irrelevant. MJ was more involved in the production and creation of his videos than JT was. He wasnt just involved in the choregraphy.He wrote the story plot, came up with the themes, direction, actors etc. He also created alot of the choreography. Yes on some videos he had maybe one or two choreographers help but he also created alot of it himself. He also directed alot of videos as well.


How was he more involved when he did nothing on the choreography of one of the videos he won an award for? He didn't create anything he learned someone elses dance steps plain and simple. And actually only won awards when he was gifted with a co-choreographor.

I wouldnt call standing on the tip of your toes simple lol The average person can not stand on the tip of their toes and do alot of the footwork Michael was doing in the video. I only brought up Billie Jean as an example of an ICONIC music video Michael has. Regardless of how simple you think it is, the video is iconic. The way the floor lights up when MJ dances on it... thats Iconic. I have seen so many references to that video.

He didn't do anything special in that video, I'm never gonna agree with that assessment. References such as?

The point is he was INVOLVED in the creation of his videos and Im sorry Smooth Criminal was FAR from average. It was a EPIC video.
The Lean alone was EPIC.
The Lean alone crushes anything JT has every done LOL hahaha

Smooth Criminal was very average. But if you want to side with mediocrity by all means.

MJ actually liked Usher and Chris Brown better.

I think Usher is a way better singer and dancer than JT and CB is a better dancer. JT does make better music out of the two but I did like the music Usher was making before he got all Europop.
When did we start talking about Usher and CB? JT out performs both of them also.

OOPS quote function done functioned. You get the point. Enjoy
FRED HALE SR. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 03:18 PM   #148 (permalink)
D-D-D-D-D-DROP THE BASS!
 
GuitarBizarre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,730
Default

Just to point out one thing I noticed in this discussion - I'm not invested enough in JT or MJ to discuss the rest, but - There is a difference between an opinion and an educated opinion. Not only that, but one can argue an opinion poorly or excellently, and anywhere in between, with or without training. Just because something is an opinion, does not mean it is immutable and CERTAINLY does not mean it cannot be criticised. Opinions can be formed on faulty premise, or poorly thought out, or an opinion can rely on evidence or fact that has been misunderstood. Those things make it no less an opinion, but they do call the opinion's validity into question, when compared with other opinions which may have fewer flaws in their logic.

To dismiss someone's training, in whatever field it may be, in this case singing, and to make the claim that their opinion is necessarily only as good as everyone elses, is to dismiss the fact that they've invested time, effort, and money, into an education that should allow them a greater scope of knowledge and a greater skill for articulation of their opinion.

In other words, them dismissing your opinion for lack of classical training would be wrong, since your argument may be sound and conclusions good, but on the same token, you shouldn't rush to dismiss someone's education in a relevant field, just to try and bring them down. That's not to say they're right or wrong, but you shouldn't attack their credentials, especially if they are relevant and worthwhile credentials.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
As for me, my inbox is as of yet testicle-free, and hopefully remains that way. Don't the rest of you get any ideas.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
I'll have you know, my ancestors were Kings of Wicklow! We're as Irish as losing a three-nil lead in a must-win fixture!
GuitarBizarre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 03:36 PM   #149 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

^

Wow this was a really good point.



My issue with this is when people try to argue that their opinion is more superior just because they ara a musician, have music education, etc. I think it is rather snobbish because you dont necessarily have to be trained in a certain area of music to have a good ear for it and to form a well thought out intelligent music opinion on it. People who are trained in music or musicians tend to think their opinions on music are more superior than people who are not musicians or who are not trained in music.

I think its irrelevent to bring up (specialize music training) in an arguement if it has nothing to do with the discussion. If we were engaging in a discussion about classical vocals or classical music I could see the reason for someone to mention they have training in it but to just mention it in order to imply that because they have training in classical vocals/music that means their opinion is more superior is rather snobbish and irrelevant to the discussion.
Soulflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 03:48 PM   #150 (permalink)
Registered Jimmy Rustler
 
Dr_Rez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtalk92 View Post
^

Wow this was a really good point.



My issue with this is when people try to argue that their opinion is more superior just because they ara a musician, have music education, etc. I think it is rather snobbish because you dont necessarily have to be trained in a certain area of music to have a good ear for it and to form a well thought out intelligent music opinion on it. People who are trained in music or musicians tend to think their opinions on music are more superior than people who are not musicians or who are not trained in music.

.
Really? So you wouldnt take the opinion of a doctor more highly on medical advice? Or a mechanic on which car will perform best? Or a teacher on the best method for controlling kids? You realize part of muscian training is developing an ear and picking out things you didnt hear before. I feel way more qualified to speak on certain music since I have studied theory/history/musicianship. Steve Vai for instance has an even more valid opinion than I.

That is ludacris. Someone with musical training is undoubtedly more qualified to talk about music related things he has studied. Take GuitarBiz, he is a fantastic guitar player. According to you I should value someone who has never studied the intruments opinion as much as his?
__________________
*Best chance of losing virginity is in prison crew*
*Always Checks Credentials Crew*
*nba > nfl crew*
*Shave one of my legs to pretend its a girl in my bed crew*
Dr_Rez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.