Nickelback vs Justin Bieber

Sharkie · 06-15-2013, 04:43 PM

Tell me, who can be called better? Regarding musical quality.

Nickelback: Used to be Overrated and overexposed, now people have opened their eyes about them. Their songs sound the same. Lack musical creativity and talent (playing isntruments is not enough) and creativity for songs a.k.a their songs sound the same. **** lyrics. Tryhard. Used to earn bagillions.
Justin Bieber: Earns bagillions. Overexposed Hated everywhere. His music is nothing especial, generic and overall boring. Typical love lyrics. Can sing and dance, but tryhard.

I'll tell you something funny: I saw a post on fb, a guy I know but I'm not friends with was bitching about Justin bieber comming to our country, he called him ****, and said why didn't worthy bands came here. He mentioned NICKELBACK.

Haha, I wanted to say that Nickelback is pretty much the JB of rock, regards to reputation, but I didn't.

I'd like you to post with a musical opinion, not just falling into bandwagoning.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 06-15-2013, 04:46 PM

Really?

**Scarlett O'Hara** · 06-16-2013, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hat€monger ?

Really?

x2.

Dr_Rez · 07-03-2013, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danielmorgan

both are junks to me .. I've left hearing the both form a long time back in past ..

I have left this thread feeling dumber.

Rjinn · 06-15-2013, 08:02 PM

The comparison between those two is weird. It's like comparing Pearl Jam to NSYNC.

Nickelback is pretty unoriginal, boring grunge rip-off and turned it into pop-rock. Justin Beiber is the kind of boy popstar that young girls swoon over. But I still can't really make a comparison between the two besides being pop.

Electrophonic Tonic · 06-15-2013, 09:54 PM

You must be the guy that goes to a youtube video of AC/DC's Back in Black and posts comment about how you're only 13 and you like "real music" and then ramble off 4-7 classic rock bands from the 70's and 80's.

TheBig3 · 06-28-2013, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electrophonic Tonic

You must be the guy that goes to a youtube video of AC/DC's Back in Black and posts comment about how you're only 13 and you like "real music" and then ramble off 4-7 classic rock bands from the 70's and 80's.

Or that ridiculous

Quote:

You say [band I hate], I say [band I like]
You say [band I hate], I say [band I like]
You say [band I hate], I say [band I like]
You say [band I hate], I say [band I like]
You say [band I hate], I say [band I like]
Real music is still out there!

Isbjørn · 06-16-2013, 12:04 PM

I'd say Nickelback. Their songs all sound the same, and there's nothing special about it, but Justin Bieber's music is completely nauseating. At least Nickelback doesn't play glitter pop.

**Goofle** · 06-16-2013, 12:13 PM

Bieber is superior.

14232949 · 06-16-2013, 12:52 PM

you'll all feel stupid when in a few years Bieber grows as an artist and drops an album similar to the 20/20 experience. you'll all bandwagon then, I tell ya.

06-15-2013, 04:43 PM	#1 (permalink)
Sharkie Music Addict Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 54	Nickelback vs Justin Bieber Tell me, who can be called better? Regarding musical quality. Nickelback: Used to be Overrated and overexposed, now people have opened their eyes about them. Their songs sound the same. Lack musical creativity and talent (playing isntruments is not enough) and creativity for songs a.k.a their songs sound the same. ** lyrics. Tryhard. Used to earn bagillions. Justin Bieber: Earns bagillions. Overexposed Hated everywhere. His music is nothing especial, generic and overall boring. Typical love lyrics. Can sing and dance, but tryhard. I'll tell you something funny: I saw a post on fb, a guy I know but I'm not friends with was bitching about Justin bieber comming to our country, he called him **, and said why didn't worthy bands came here. He mentioned NICKELBACK. Haha, I wanted to say that Nickelback is pretty much the JB of rock, regards to reputation, but I didn't. I'd like you to post with a musical opinion, not just falling into bandwagoning. __________________ "I'm sick and tired of people saying that we put out 11 albums that sound exactly the same. In fact, we've put out 12 albums that sound exactly the same." -Angus Young

06-15-2013, 04:46 PM	#2 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,626	Really? __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

06-15-2013, 08:02 PM	#5 (permalink)
Rjinn The Aerosol in your Soul Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: New South Wales, Australia Posts: 1,546	The comparison between those two is weird. It's like comparing Pearl Jam to NSYNC. Nickelback is pretty unoriginal, boring grunge rip-off and turned it into pop-rock. Justin Beiber is the kind of boy popstar that young girls swoon over. But I still can't really make a comparison between the two besides being pop. __________________ last.fm

06-16-2013, 12:04 PM	#8 (permalink)
Isbjørn cooler commie than elph Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: In a hole, help Posts: 2,811	I'd say Nickelback. Their songs all sound the same, and there's nothing special about it, but Justin Bieber's music is completely nauseating. At least Nickelback doesn't play glitter pop. __________________ fast(ml) Hear me play the guitar Look, mom! I got a journal

06-15-2013, 09:54 PM	#6 (permalink)
Electrophonic Tonic Your Ad Here Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: The Twilight Zone Posts: 876	You must be the guy that goes to a youtube video of AC/DC's Back in Black and posts comment about how you're only 13 and you like "real music" and then ramble off 4-7 classic rock bands from the 70's and 80's.

06-16-2013, 12:52 PM	#10 (permalink)
14232949 The Big Dog Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Scotland Posts: 1,989	you'll all feel stupid when in a few years Bieber grows as an artist and drops an album similar to the 20/20 experience. you'll all bandwagon then, I tell ya.