|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
|
![]()
I think the 2 records are as different as night & day.
The White album is The Beatles trying to be everything they're not and as a result it just sounds like 4 guys in a studio with no direction other than making some awful art school hipster turd of a record for the sake of making it. On the other hand Exile is the Stones going back to their roots and making an album that is 100% them and and all their various influences and as a result I think the songs are better, the album is much more cohesive and it's a much tighter record because of it. It's kind of like one band goofing around in a studio and one band playing something that they've lived with their whole lives and I think it shows. I've only ever met 2 types of people who don't rate Exile, and that's Beatles fanboys and people who don't really have much interest in blues & early rock n roll anyway.
__________________
![]() Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
![]() |
![]() |
|