|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 531
|
Personally I thought in the context of what the Beatles were trying to accomplish at the time Yellow Submarine was a perfect fit. The song that left me scratching my head was All Together Now. Never liked the lyrics and never liked the music.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
|
I don't see how it would be better as a single album.
Each of the 4 sides of the album have very different character and even as a double album it barely reaches over an hour in length. To me it's 15 minutes of rock followed by 15 minutes of country followed by 15 minutes of blues followed by 20 minutes of everything mixed together. I don't really see how it can be considered boring.
__________________
![]() Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
|
Exactly because of the reason I stated...
It's 15 minutes of half assed rock followed by 15 minutes of half assed country, etc. Stones albums are better when they are consistent and focused.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
Quote:
When you say boring, it kills the discussion. What was boring about it? In addition to what Urban said, its also got soul and gospel in there. Can you give me a comparably boring album? Trying to figure out what aspect bores you is like pulling teeth.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
|
Quote:
What exactly do you want from this? I think saying it sounds like second rate versions of the styles they are trying to pull off is fairly specific. Do you want a song by song analysis of this thing? I think I left plenty of room for more discussion. How about you tell me why you DON'T think they are half assed versions of their influences? Did they add to them in some meaningful way? Was the nostalgia factor enough to keep you interested? Because for me they weren't. There's a topic right there. Proceed.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
Quote:
To me, the music on Exile was less pop and more raw, which given the topics seemed to lend itself to the material. Songs like Sweet Virginia was the sloppy that defines the stones. The tight, polished, upbeat tempo of things like Brown Sugar or Jumping Jack Flash were gone. Off of My Cloud and Paint it Blacks pop sheen were gone. This was the stones in the grime that made them the stones. When you hear Shine a Light, its as if the Allman Brothers had sex with Ray Charles in a bathtub full of Scotch and Sweet Tea. If I were looking for the closest sounding big track to compare it to, I guess I'd say "Can't always get what you want" but to suggest its the same thing is reaching (IMO). Tumbling Dice I guess is comparable to maybe Honky Tonk Women or Wild Horses, but it comes with a funked out soul groove that the other two just don't have. If the Stones had previously been in Nashville or Chicago on other records, Exile is in New Orleans.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 531
|
I would like to point out that a lot of the songs that were left off Exile On Main Street would have made some great options for future albums. In my opinion some of them are even better then what ended up on the album! Plundered My Soul, Good Time Woman, etc etc it's all there in glowing black and white.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|