|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-13-2013, 07:57 AM | #34 (permalink) |
No Ice In My Bourbon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,326
|
Well I'm a lazy mofo, and flipping and putting that many records back in their sleeves is still a pain. All I'm saying is that it's easier/more convenient to listen to an album like "All Eyez on Me" or "Mellon Collie" on CD.
|
05-14-2013, 04:07 AM | #35 (permalink) | |
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
I think vinyls split the album up in more meaningful ways though, especially for albums like On the Beach, where the first half is very eclectic and a little scatterbrained, and the second is more folky, atmospheric, and introspective; or Funhouse, where the Saxophone is latterly introduced and the songs become wilder even than the first half. Grizzly Bear even split their newest album up conceptually on vinyl, and it's an album that was made to be almost entirely cohesive as if for CD.
Oh, and Smile makes the truest sense of Brian Wilson's vision on vinyl.
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
Last edited by Surell; 05-17-2013 at 01:33 AM. Reason: i need to sleep more |
|
05-14-2013, 02:29 PM | #37 (permalink) | ||
No Ice In My Bourbon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,326
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-14-2013, 04:06 PM | #39 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mars
Posts: 108
|
What I love about vinyls is that, for example, prog rock albums like The Wall and Dark ide (obviously) were intended to be one long song, and on the vinyl this is achieved, whereas on the cd it kinda breaks it up a lot more.
__________________
Welcome to the internet, where opinions are like toilets; everyone thinks theirs are perfect but the public ones stink. |
|