Live performance or studio recording? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2012, 10:11 PM   #11 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
JustJunMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Hongcouver & Global
Posts: 125
Default

I dont feel it matters the genre, a mix of both is what should be good sounding, in that even if you are in a studio, you want it to sound live

it is kind of like the pre mix of a song where it sounds dry and flat and then you add the color
__________________
So now I cant even post my own nickname in my signature or have an avatar of a graphic design I made that has my username on here? I dont know who is doing it but please provide a legit reason why my material is suddenly being singled out. Thanks
JustJunMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 10:28 PM   #12 (permalink)
Make it so
 
Scarlett O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Totally depends who it is. With jazz, for example, I tend to prefer live recordings, but with metal I definitely prefer studio.
I'm on the same page, I link live acoustic and studio recording for electronica.
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
Scarlett O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 11:59 AM   #13 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Beautiful California, USA!
Posts: 49
Default

As others have mentioned, it depends on on the genre. A lot of live versions of some songs aren't presented too differently than the studio version (i.e. Cheap Trick, Rush), whereas a group like Led Zeppelin might play the songs in a completely different manner.

Something like the live version of "Dazed And Confused" from TSRTS soundtrack is a great example, they really took it to a different place compared to the studio version: different segue sections and solos, etc.
kidney_thief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 08:34 PM   #14 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: indoors
Posts: 722
Default

I can think of almost no cases where I prefer a live version of a song to the recorded version. For what it's worth, I generally don't like jazz and acoustic and don't particularly like attending concerts.
sopsych is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 08:38 PM   #15 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tifton, GA
Posts: 14
Default

I can dig both, but they both have there place, being in a band myself, sometimes i sacrifice playing during the live show for the sake of the "show" i feel the need to give people a good show seeing as they paid to come see me! but Thrice, just released a new completely live recording of they're farewell tour, and its legit
Rest. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:28 PM   #16 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 10
Default

I have to say both....I love to listen to the studio version first.....then I want to see how the song has " evolved " and how they play it " today" , live....
Counting Crows come to mind....live versions always seem to have something a little different. In a nice way....lol.
12barblues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 08:57 PM   #17 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 6
Default

maybe both? but voice recording is much better for me because the voice is good, there's a plan, coach and etc.
xtian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.