Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Does music actually have rules? (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/65884-does-music-actually-have-rules.html)

crazyaga 11-05-2012 10:01 AM

Pink Floyd used alot of noises as a part of their music.Speak To Me,the beggining of Time and Money, those transition between songs in Wish You Were Here.... and some parts of The Wall too.
Even though all of those songs parts, and the whole song "Speak To Me" are only noises, they are still considered music.

Jmeezy 11-07-2012 07:12 PM

That's what's great about making music. You get to create your own rules

Norg 11-07-2012 07:47 PM

There are no RUles anything goes

blastingas10 11-08-2012 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Euronomus (Post 1247539)
Just remember this, The rules of harmony you learn in a music theory class were a discovery, not an invention. Harmony is all about how waveforms overlap and even if you don't learn all the rules, or purposely try and break the ones you know, you're still following the rules of harmony because they are really laws of physics.

Great post.

I guess it could be said that we didn't invent the laws of music, we observed and took note of them.

But then again, I guess the laws were based around what sounded "good" or "right", and that's completely subjective. Or is it?

The Batlord 11-08-2012 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali (Post 1247469)
Rule # 1.
Must have sound of some kind.


Frownland 11-08-2012 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1248878)

The sound isn't made with the instruments, no, but John Cage wanted the sound of the music to be in the listener's world around them. In it's original setting, he wanted the audience to hear sounds of the orchestra room. So there.

The Batlord 11-08-2012 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1248881)
The sound isn't made with the instruments, no, but John Cage wanted the sound of the music to be in the listener's world around them. In it's original setting, he wanted the audience to hear sounds of the orchestra room. So there.

Yeah, that sounds like pretentious nonsense to me. An interesting experiment, but still, pretentious nonsense.

someonecompletelyrandom 11-08-2012 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali (Post 1247469)
Rule # 1.
Must have sound of some kind.

Rule # 2.
?

http://richardlannoy.files.wordpress...dxiht5n-1.jpeg

EDIT: Well... it seems Batlord has beat me to the punch. Well played. You're lucky I'm not the bitter kind of moderator who would lose his shit and ban you.

Guybrush 11-08-2012 10:46 AM

I personally don't consider 4'33 to be music, even if it is a written piece.

someonecompletelyrandom 11-08-2012 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tore (Post 1248906)
I personally don't consider 4'33 to be music, even if it is a written piece.

I view it more as a message than as music, but it inevitably devolves into the art semantics debate when the matter is pushed.

I think he wanted to say "There is sound all around us, all of the time. There is no such thing as silence. The sounds can be as beautiful as music." And that's exactly the point he made with 4"33. He has so many more wonderful pieces it's really a shame people latch onto this one and associate him exclusively with it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.