|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-20-2012, 01:46 PM | #152 (permalink) |
.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,007
|
It would make sense that he'd think formulaic music is the primo stuff 'cause
he seems to be hooked into the idea that mass-produced/-listened to music must be the grand good thing that the good capitalists want us to believe is our Vitamin C - the music that plays well within the "3 and 5 minutes in length" that he so cherishes. "...radio and music television wouldn't be so full of 3-5 minute songs if that weren't the public's preference..." I'm off to write my novel which, as everyone knows, will only be good if I keep it between 213 and 294 pages. |
08-20-2012, 02:01 PM | #153 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: indoors
Posts: 722
|
The Rainbow starts out strongly. The Threshold song starts out well (I like a mix of powerful guitar and keyboards). The other two songs begin boring and that's the end for me. I think non-prog rock should be exempt from my claim about long songs not starting "nicely," since electric guitar played by a professional almost always is decent (to anyone who likes electric guitar) and that's how most rock songs start. But a long song needs much more than respectable guitar to be good, and too much guitar can be grating. A long song probably needs better playing and often more instruments to be as enjoyable a listen as a shorter song.
As for "formulaic," I didn't say I like songs that are particularly formulaic. Of the songs I love, 4:30 probably is about their average length - it seems to allow for experimentation without getting too far from the formula of what's pleasing to the human ear. |
08-20-2012, 02:21 PM | #155 (permalink) | |
.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
|
Quote:
Have you listened to every rock song and gotten enough information to make a claim about the entire genre? Have you listened to all the sub genres and noticed that not all rock sounds the same? You're also starting to take genres out of your argument and still trying to claim that you know what you're talking about. |
|
|