Rolling Stone: 10 Greatest Albums of All Time - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: top 10 albums of all time?
Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 12 17.65%
Pet Sounds 5 7.35%
Revolver 5 7.35%
Highway 61 Revisited 7 10.29%
Rubber Soul 2 2.94%
What's Going On? 4 5.88%
Exile on Main St. 4 5.88%
London Calling 10 14.71%
Blonde on Blonde 4 5.88%
The Beatles (The White Album) 7 10.29%
I hate all of them! 8 11.76%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2012, 05:02 PM   #201 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

I totally understand the complains about the list. I'm not saying they are, but who's to say the Beatles aren't the greatest band ever, who's to say they are? Nobody, It's all subjective.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 05:15 PM   #202 (permalink)
Horribly Creative
 
Unknown Soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London, The Big Smoke
Posts: 8,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salami View Post
But surely with the Stones it has to really be a different kind of fanatic - the sort of person who's fanatical about the Beatles will usually tend to work on the idea that they were the "most influential" and "most innovative" side of the argument, and following that therefore all other bands are inferior copies (or such seems to be the sort of argument made). They'll point out that the catchy, simple lyrics and instrumentation in their songs formed the roots of modern pop and that people related to it more than any other band.
The Stones fanatics won't really pursue that line of reasoning - they are far more likely to argue that the lyrics are deeper and deal with real world problems. As a result, I find it hard not to imagine the Stones obsessives being altogether more worldly and more rough than the Beatles bores.
The Stones bores are different but the outcome is just the same. Sure they don't go on about innovation and being influential like Beatles fans do, they just tend to see themselves as understanding what rock n roll is all about and the Rolling Stones typify that belief. Any argument against them, they just laugh off, they kind of see the Stones as untouchables. It all get very boring really, especially since they usually have a lack of knowledge of other bands from that era.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by eraser.time206 View Post
If you can't deal with the fact that there are 6+ billion people in the world and none of them think exactly the same that's not my problem. Just deal with it yourself or make actual conversation. This isn't a court and I'm not some poet or prophet that needs everything I say to be analytically critiqued.
Metal Wars

Power Metal

Pounding Decibels- A Hard and Heavy History
Unknown Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 05:26 PM   #203 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
The Stones bores are different but the outcome is just the same. Sure they don't go on about innovation and being influential like Beatles fans do, they just tend to see themselves as understanding what rock n roll is all about and the Rolling Stones typify that belief. Any argument against them, they just laugh off, they kind of see the Stones as untouchables. It all get very boring really, especially since they usually have a lack of knowledge of other bands from that era.
I find that to be kind of a hallmark of people who think it's all about one particular artist.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 07:16 PM   #204 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
Sure they don't go on about innovation and being influential like Beatles fans do, they just tend to see themselves as understanding what rock n roll is all about and the Rolling Stones typify that belief.
The Stones have a fair amount of firsts. But they are not quite as impressive as Paul McCartney plugging in his bass directly into the recording console.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
Any argument against them, they just laugh off, they kind of see the Stones as untouchables.
yeah the Stones are untouchable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
It all get very boring really, especially since they usually have a lack of knowledge of other bands from that era.
The Stones spans six decades, that's a heck lot of bands you demand us to know.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 07:31 PM   #205 (permalink)
The Aerosol in your Soul
 
Rjinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 1,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingas10 View Post
Simple fundamentals? Hmm. You must not know their music very well. They did a lot more than simple fundamentals. Ever hear the song "happiness is a warm gun"?
I do own a lot of their albums and most of their songs were simplistic. When I say fundaments it's more a figure of an open door towards rock and pop music. That's part of the reason why they were so influential. Some of their songs were more sophisticated than others, but hardly in a general sense. Especially comparing them with today's kind.
__________________
last.fm
Rjinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 08:26 PM   #206 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

Sure, there are more complex bands, but there are also bands who are a lot more simple.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 09:01 PM   #207 (permalink)
The Aerosol in your Soul
 
Rjinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 1,546
Default

Not doubting that there are. Was just giving reasons why The Beatles were easy to pass through.
__________________
last.fm
Rjinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 09:31 PM   #208 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjinnx View Post
Not doubting that there are. Was just giving reasons why The Beatles were easy to pass through.
I didn't really like them upon first exposure, but after a couple listens and with some pushing, they're one of my top ten bands.
Key is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 09:52 PM   #209 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

Exact same here. I used talk down on them, they used to be some pussy pop band in my eyes, but then i gave them a chance and started researching their music and really developed a great respect for them. I realized they weren't as simple as they can appear to be, and weren't a formulaic pop band. They were actually are quite experimental and innovative for popular music. They were always developing and experimenting with their sound, more so than most rock/pop bands.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 09:52 PM   #210 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingas10 View Post
Sure, there are more complex bands, but there are also bands who are a lot more simple.
The Beatles did both simple and complex songs. I think when they were playing a Blues-type song then the chord progression was simple, and somtimes when they played something like a showtune like 'Til There Was You" then the chord progression was complex. But in genereal they got more complex as they went along, then they went back to the basics e.g. One After 909. Plus they are the only band I know to ever use an Augmented chord, I think that was made them intriguing to some because they heard some unusual chord and thought subconscientiously "That's different, what chord was that?" I think that added to The Beatles appeal.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.