|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: The Cure or The Smiths? | |||
The Cure | 46 | 53.49% | |
The Smiths | 40 | 46.51% | |
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-19-2012, 10:55 AM | #82 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 429
|
Quote:
|
|
07-19-2012, 10:58 AM | #83 (permalink) | |
The Aerosol in your Soul
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 1,546
|
Quote:
__________________
last.fm |
|
07-22-2012, 03:52 AM | #86 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15
|
Defiantly the Smiths
__________________
Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it. John Lennon Please read our rules regarding links in sigs http://www.musicbanter.com/introduct...res-today.html |
07-22-2012, 02:33 PM | #88 (permalink) |
air quote
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
|
I like both bands. The Smiths thankfully stopped before they began to make bad music but I still prefer The Cure. Their (pre-90s) music means a lot more to me. Unlike the formulaic Smiths who wrote songs for the strange British disco-dancing market, The Cure offer a variety of sounds and their songs/albums are more pleasing overall. I'm really only responding to this in order to help out The Cure's poll numbers. Because they're the better band.
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through. |
07-22-2012, 03:16 PM | #90 (permalink) |
air quote
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
|
Longevity of a band's existence is a meaningless way to judge quality. Lots of later Cure music is awful. I shudder to think what Marr and Morrissey may be doing now if they continued together. Probably the exact same stuff they did when they were The Smiths, but worse.
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through. |
|