The Evolution of Music: Accident, or Adaptation? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2012, 08:44 AM   #221 (permalink)
Get in ma belly
 
Salami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 1,385
Default

I'm giving this thread a bump for a few reasons:
Firstly, I'm hoping that there are some new ideas about this subject, and it's good to give ourselves a break from thinking about a certain topic, because we can return with new ideas.

Also, it had sparked perhaps one of the best discussions I've come across on music banter, and I'm hoping it can be replicated!
Salami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2012, 11:45 AM   #222 (permalink)
Luciferian
 
SIRIUSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 278
Default

Well allllrighty then!

Quote:
. . . music and language evolved as two specializations from a common ancestor,such that a series shared ancestral features evolved before either analogous or distinct features. This model is distinguished from those holding that music evolved from a dedicated linguistic capacity (music outgrowth model) or that language developed from a dedicated musical capacity (language outgrowth model). It argues instead that shared ancestral features of music and language should be thought of as musilinguistic rather than either musical or linguistic.
From a pdf. "THEORIES OF MUSIC ORIGIN" . . . a rather heady but informative text concerning this subject.
__________________
Welcome to my Strange Musiq
TaRkHeM
SIRIUSB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.