|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-17-2011, 03:49 AM | #81 (permalink) | |
Groupie
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Finally, yes. Yes, it does have an affect and you can appreciate things in a different, more perceptive manner. If you want to argue your point. Get high first so you know what you're talking about. |
|
11-17-2011, 06:12 AM | #82 (permalink) | |
∞
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,792
|
Quote:
It does make songs seem longer or slower in some cases and that's not a bad thing. You find yourself becoming immersed in the music and paying more attention to every note and detail and nothing seems to pass you by, hence giving the feeling that the song is longer. To be honest drinking has a more negative effect on my music listening, when I start binging on Pearl Jam then I know I've had enough and it's time to go to bed.
__________________
|
|
11-17-2011, 07:09 AM | #88 (permalink) | ||
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
My point comes from the experience of knowing people who smoke lots of pot, and people who don't, and the people who smoke pot often tend to be drawn to significantly simpler bassier music(hip-hop, doom metal, etc.). Where as, I listen to probably more layered music than they do(jazz, classical, prog). Not to say that I'm a better listener, or that layered means more musical. Just calling BS on the concept that weed somehow makes complex music more easy to comprehend. When, in actuality, all evidence points that pot makes one crave the opposite. As for demanding I smoke weed, I take the Frank Zappa defense. The man heavily criticized drug usage, and heavily questioned it's importance in understanding/creating music. Perhaps, I'm utilizing an element of shared knowledge as he's probably the most clear minded, and logical, thinker of any musician I've seen.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|