|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-12-2011, 08:32 PM | #31 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
The problem with this comparison is that they come from drastically different eras. Buckethead has a world of technology/technique that was developed through the 70s, and 80s that Hendrix didn't really.
Futhermore, Buckethead, more technical or no, existed in an era with digital recording, and clean sounding amps. In the 60s, that clarity was pretty much impossible, and Hendrix played better of his limitations. Where as Buckethead really didn't have as many due to his time. Not to mention, also, Buckethead is a vast imitator who collects, and assembles things, where as Hendrix was more of an inventor.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-12-2011, 09:21 PM | #32 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
Quote:
I agree. Hendrix definitely was an innovator. He was more innovative and creative in his time than Buckethead is in his time. But how is Buckethead an imitator? |
|
11-12-2011, 09:52 PM | #34 (permalink) | ||
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
His compositional style comes entirely from collecting pieces together, and iconoclastically throwing them together. IE. each piece of every song he does is a chameleon act. Which isn't a bad thing at all, I'm just saying. Hendrix's process was significantly more organic, and more on adapting his sound under an envelope of specific goals rather than referencing to the vast library of music created before him. Buckethead makes a very fine respectful nod to his past, but Hendrix moved things into the future.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-12-2011, 10:47 PM | #35 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
Quote:
|
|
11-12-2011, 11:18 PM | #36 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Why wouldn't I be a Hendrix fan? During his time, he was considered a radical, and an experimenter. He'd intermix complex compositions with extremely theoretically irreverent solos. He was a ton notch producer, and a creative force that let nobody tell him what to do.
If anything, Hendrix is right up my alley. I'm for liberal musicians, and the man's technique was far from conservative. He even lived homeless for a large portion of his life to pursue his art. He even played with his teeth.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-12-2011, 11:33 PM | #38 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
My I add:
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-12-2011, 11:37 PM | #39 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 263
|
I've only listened to 4 albums of Buckethead but in those albums I've listened to I definitely heard more emotion than Hendrix. Hendrix was not very emotional. He was sensual. Buckethead is the only guitarist that ever made me relook things. I think that even if Jimi Hendrix were born the same time as Buckethead with the same advantages that he wouldn't be as good.
You have to remember that Buckethead is not mainstream. If he was mainstream (it's probably his fault he's not) he would be very famous for his playing.
__________________
Before I go on, let me warn you that I talk dirty, and that I will say things you will neither enjoy nor agree with. You shouldn't feel threatened, though, because I am a mere buffoon, and you are all philosophers. |
|