|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-01-2011, 11:02 PM | #41 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
Quote:
Last edited by blastingas10; 11-02-2011 at 04:23 AM. |
|
11-02-2011, 07:40 AM | #42 (permalink) |
Front to Back
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 360
|
I agree that all *real* music is 100% subjective to the listeners ears. It is purely a matter of taste; however, there has to be some sort of minimum requirement for what constitutes *real* music. Otherwise, there is certainly categorically bad music.
For example, if I get up and sing karaoke to Bone thugs-n-harmondy- "Crossroads," there is not a person on the planet that would consider it good music; therefore, I would classify my hypothetical karaoke performance as not *real* music. If there is not a minimum requirement of what *real* music is, then the whole subjective argument shatters, and there would certainly be examples of good and bad music at polar opposite ends of the musical spectrum. This is really a philosophical question, as it applies to all art, and I remember it being discussed ad nauseam in philosophy 101 courses when I was in college. |
11-02-2011, 08:21 AM | #44 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 263
|
Hmm...
All music is subjective. End of story. If you think Justin Beiber is the best then by all means enjoy his music.
__________________
Before I go on, let me warn you that I talk dirty, and that I will say things you will neither enjoy nor agree with. You shouldn't feel threatened, though, because I am a mere buffoon, and you are all philosophers. |
11-02-2011, 09:49 AM | #45 (permalink) |
Way Out There
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 850
|
Interesting, coming from a person you condemns the whole British Invasion.
__________________
rock n music blog |
11-02-2011, 10:31 AM | #47 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 263
|
Connect
You obviously aren't connecting things together properly.
__________________
Before I go on, let me warn you that I talk dirty, and that I will say things you will neither enjoy nor agree with. You shouldn't feel threatened, though, because I am a mere buffoon, and you are all philosophers. |
11-02-2011, 11:44 AM | #48 (permalink) | ||
...here to hear...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: He lives on Love Street
Posts: 4,444
|
Quote:
Quote:
I`m really undecided on this issue; I don`t like the idea of people going around labelling music good or bad, or somehow measuring one artist up against another, but there must surely be some way of assessing music, to distinguish a karaoki performance from an orchestral concert. Besides, every time mags like Rolling Stone publish another "100 best ..." list, aren`t they tacitly declaring that, yes, there is good and bad in music ? And here`s a question for musicians: when you make an effort to improve your performance, or make a mistake, aren`t you also saying, "This is good music, that was bad, this is better" ? The concept of good or bad in music may be difficult to pin down, but I`m sure it`s out there somewhere. |
||
11-02-2011, 01:54 PM | #50 (permalink) | |
Chocolate Homunculus
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,293
|
I believe that while music is subjective, you can still divide music into the categories of good and bad. For instance, I don't like Sufjan Stevens, but I have to admit that he created technically good music. Likewise, there are probably lots of people out there who enjoy listening to Rebecca Black's "Friday", but there should be no disagreement over the fact that that song is a piece of ****.
__________________
Quote:
Last.Fm My Bomb Music Shit |
|
|