"There Should Be A Mandatory Retirement Age Of 40 In Rock 'N' Roll" - Johnny Ramone

bogey_j · 09-02-2011, 11:01 PM

I agree johnny, there is nothing more embarrassing than an old ass rockstar still trying to act young and rebellious

Necromancer · 09-03-2011, 12:08 AM

I actually think that most people that set an age limit (say 40 or 50) are either jealous or just arrogant.

Most all the mega solo artist and bands of the day are between the ages of their 40 and 60s. The times have changed, you don't have to be in your 20s anymore to be a rock star and your career is no longer winding down when you hit your late 30s. If that were the case, there wouldn't be very many good music acts around worth seeing.

I agree, its a fact some artist decline and should retire If their music and performance is not up to par, but some older artist are actually better than ever in their late 50s to 60 years of age. Paul Rodgers is just one example of such an artist.

Look how old some of the blues and country artist are, and still performing. Buddy Guy is still at the top of his game at the ripe old age of 70 +. Tony Bennet and Merle Haggard are are few older artist to mention, that still have a powerful voice.

I will admit after seeing Rod Stewart the other day on cable, he should "maybe" seriously start to think about retirement.

Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra · 09-03-2011, 12:32 AM

I think Johnny should have quit Rock N' Roll when he was 15...

Anyway, I disagree. There is no reason an artist should EVER bend his will to public appeal. If it's ****, **** it. If you love making music, make ****ing music. As long as they never stop seeking self improvement.

I mean, after all, Jazz composers and classical composers make their work a lifetime profession. Why not 'rockers'?

Paedantic Basterd · 09-03-2011, 01:12 AM

Scott Walker and Tom Waits come to my mind as evidence that age is irrelevant.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 09-03-2011, 01:31 AM

I'd say the stuff he's put out in the last 10 years is the best stuff he's done since the mid 80s. So no, I disagree.

I think some bands do have a shelf life of around 3 or 4 albums, but that's about having nothing more to say, lack of originality or just being irrelevant rather than age.

RVCA · 09-03-2011, 02:54 AM

Well what about people like Robert Plant? Perhaps the only member of Zeppelin who's realized his glory days of rebellion and youthfulness are over, he's shelved his hard rock ways in favor of a quiet folk/country solo career. Truly respectable, in my opinion.

Howard the Duck · 09-03-2011, 06:09 AM

i think Paul McCartney's recent work is ruddy more interesting than the width of his past career, except for the Beatless

Unknown Soldier · 09-03-2011, 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RVCA

Well what about people like Robert Plant? Perhaps the only member of Zeppelin who's realized his glory days of rebellion and youthfulness are over, he's shelved his hard rock ways in favor of a quiet folk/country solo career. Truly respectable, in my opinion.

He should have shelved his hard rock ways a looooooooong time ago, he hasn`t done anything good (hard rock wise) since his Zeppelin days anyway.

Sneer · 09-03-2011, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bogey_j

I agree johnny, there is nothing more embarrassing than an old ass rockstar still trying to act young and rebellious

On top of the examples already given in opposition to this statement, Sonic Youth are still rolling out great albums, and they're in their 50s. Bullshit thing to say. If you have that creative spark, use it, irrespective of age.

**Janszoon** · 09-03-2011, 07:56 AM

Johnny C. thinks Johnny R. is full of shit.

View Poll Results: do you agree with johnny?
I agree, these old guys need to know when to stop and hang it up	0	0%
Disagree, age is just a number. you don't stop being creative just because you're old	20	68.97%
Make a dramatic exit like overdosing or blowing your brains out. better to burn out than fade away	1	3.45%
I think an artist's late work is sometimes more interesting	4	13.79%
Overwhelming success can kill creativity so its better to bow out while you're still in your prime	0	0%
I reckon that an aging rapper is more embarrassing than an aging rockstar	4	13.79%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

09-02-2011, 11:01 PM	#1 (permalink)
bogey_j Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 95	"There Should Be A Mandatory Retirement Age Of 40 In Rock 'N' Roll" - Johnny Ramone I agree johnny, there is nothing more embarrassing than an old ass rockstar still trying to act young and rebellious

09-03-2011, 01:31 AM	#5 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	I'd say the stuff he's put out in the last 10 years is the best stuff he's done since the mid 80s. So no, I disagree. I think some bands do have a shelf life of around 3 or 4 albums, but that's about having nothing more to say, lack of originality or just being irrelevant rather than age. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

09-03-2011, 07:56 AM	#10 (permalink)
Janszoon Mate, Spawn & Die Join Date: May 2007 Location: The Rapping Community Posts: 24,593	Johnny C. thinks Johnny R. is full of shit. __________________ A Night in the Life of the Invisible Man Time & Place 25 Albums You Should Hear Before the Moon Crashes into the Earth and We All Die last.fm

09-03-2011, 12:08 AM	#2 (permalink)
Necromancer Divination Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,655	I actually think that most people that set an age limit (say 40 or 50) are either jealous or just arrogant. Most all the mega solo artist and bands of the day are between the ages of their 40 and 60s. The times have changed, you don't have to be in your 20s anymore to be a rock star and your career is no longer winding down when you hit your late 30s. If that were the case, there wouldn't be very many good music acts around worth seeing. I agree, its a fact some artist decline and should retire If their music and performance is not up to par, but some older artist are actually better than ever in their late 50s to 60 years of age. Paul Rodgers is just one example of such an artist. Look how old some of the blues and country artist are, and still performing. Buddy Guy is still at the top of his game at the ripe old age of 70 +. Tony Bennet and Merle Haggard are are few older artist to mention, that still have a powerful voice. I will admit after seeing Rod Stewart the other day on cable, he should "maybe" seriously start to think about retirement.

09-03-2011, 01:12 AM	#4 (permalink)
Paedantic Basterd Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 5,184	Scott Walker and Tom Waits come to my mind as evidence that age is irrelevant.

09-03-2011, 02:54 AM	#6 (permalink)
RVCA （￣ー￣） Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 3,270	Well what about people like Robert Plant? Perhaps the only member of Zeppelin who's realized his glory days of rebellion and youthfulness are over, he's shelved his hard rock ways in favor of a quiet folk/country solo career. Truly respectable, in my opinion.