Online Album Reviews - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2011, 02:05 PM   #11 (permalink)
Chocolate Homunculus
 
Phantom Limb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,293
Default

How do they act like snobs? Is it because they generally use colorful vocabulary? Or is it because they give a lot of "mainstream" artists bad reviews (which they deserve 99% of the time)?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofle11 View Post
Hip Hop generally bores me now I just listen to stuff I know will be slightly interesting.

Last.Fm

My Bomb Music Shit
Phantom Limb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 02:15 PM   #12 (permalink)
Buzz Killjoy
 
BastardofYoung's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,692
Default

I do not think it is the actual site that is the problem, just the majority of the people who pop up who just agree with everything... instead of just coming to their own conclusions, they seem to just agree with everybody elses.

I do not get that type of thing, like people who won't go to a movie cause Roger Ebert said it sucked.

I just look at that site as a source of entertainment. some of their stuff is well written, and reeks of retro teenage angst a lot of the time. It is like a review site for the jaded, made by the jaded.

I do not mind Pitchfork, but I find 99% of people who I have met who frequent it obnxious.
__________________
last.fm

‎"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.
BastardofYoung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 03:26 PM   #13 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abearmauledme View Post
How do they act like snobs? Is it because they generally use colorful vocabulary? Or is it because they give a lot of "mainstream" artists bad reviews (which they deserve 99% of the time)?
Maybe it's because they're guilty of what so many other music reviewers are; getting behind an artist just so they can be remembered as the source that broke the artist through. Not as bad about this as NME, per se, but still. They also try to appeal to a certain audience, which I guess is ok if you're the audience they reach out to. Plus, one need only look at a Brent DiCrescenzo review to see why pitchfork is trash.

allmusic is the one and only professional review site I trust remotely, and even then they can be a bit loopy. Sometimes their scores and reviews don't match up at all, probably has something to do with how ridiculously large a database they have.

Oh and I love people who equate reading reviews to jeopardizing your personal tastes. I don't know about you but I have enough self control to read critics' reviews and not let them decide for me whether I like something or not. Mostly I use them to discover music I haven't yet heard anyways.

Last edited by midnight rain; 06-17-2011 at 03:50 PM.
midnight rain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2011, 06:25 AM   #14 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Raust's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,411
Default

I occasionally go to sputnikmusic or amazon when considering to look at an album. Gives you a more accurate idea of how the album is by the number of viewers who contribute to those sites.
Raust is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.