Music Education and the White Paper - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2011, 08:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Default Music Education and the White Paper

The only conclusion I can draw from an analysis of the White Paper today is that Music will not be a core subject in the next version of the National Curriculum.

The results of this are potentially catostrophic. It will mean the end of a systematic, coherent and developmental music education for all pupils whatever the Henley Review recommends.

I know that things may not be perfect now. But they will get a lot worse. If you care about a quality music education for all our young people I suggest you start campaigning hard.

What's your reading?
andylove2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 08:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Massive shame. Problem in our current culture is that art is such a commodity that it's only respected as a commodity, and those who make money with it may, or may not, have went to school. Most highly educated musicians either cut down their full usage of their potential to make it, or fade into obscurity.

A music degree will not get you money unless you want to teach music, and it seems rather illogical from an economic perspective to teach a subject where only teachers make money.

Not saying it's right, but it's why it's happening, assuming it is.
__________________
Quote:
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
Al Pacino = God
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.