How "underground" does a band need to be to...be "underground"

mrguy · 11-02-2010, 04:47 AM

Firstly; I put "underground" in quotations, as I don't like it as an adjective for music... But I can't think of a more suitable word at the moment.

Anyway, I write a column on a music blog called The Plug (where a plug small, relatively unknown acts who need a little promotion). The first band I did, Battle Circus, had 700 something listeners on last.fm. The band liked my write up, and all the readers seemed to like the music... Anyway, I'm trying to set my guidelines for how "underground" a band needs to be to feature...
The next group I'm considering doing have around 7000 plays on last.fm (decided to primarily base in on last.fm listeners), and I thought this was quite a lot. But then there is another group called "sleepmakeswaves" (Australian post-rock) who have one ep and one split ep (no album), and I thought were pretty unheard of. Yet they have 28,000 listeners...

So, how many/few listeners is "underground"?

cardboard adolescent · 11-02-2010, 05:49 AM

35786 or less

**Janszoon** · 11-02-2010, 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrguy

So, how many/few listeners is "underground"?

I don't think I'd base it on last.fm to be honest. I'd base it on things like whether or not they're on a major label and whether not they have music that has charted.

Iggy Stardust · 11-02-2010, 09:53 AM

what makes the difference between underground and indie???

*my personal opinion of indie is any band that becomes independantly well known without their music being on tv, radio, or advertised at all

ThePhanastasio · 11-02-2010, 10:03 AM

Yeah, I don't know if last.fm is the *best* indicator as to whether or not a band's "underground". A lot of bands still remain unknown of by the general populace, but may get a lot of plays on last.fm because they tend to play in one of the larger metropolitan areas in a given area, and as such, a lot of people in that specific area have heard of them.

A better indicator would be to really research the band. What label are they on, or are they still unsigned? Where have they played, and have they been a support act for other unknown bands, or are they a true up-and-coming band, already headlining the bill for shows? How many albums have they released?

Things like this are better taken into account than last.fm plays.

~~James~~ · 11-02-2010, 11:52 AM

At least past the subway.

TheCunningStunt · 11-02-2010, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James

At leat past the subway.

Would you say The Subways are a band that's underground?

**Janszoon** · 11-02-2010, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt

Would you say The Subways are a band that's underground?

Could be. But The Streets clearly are not.

TheCunningStunt · 11-02-2010, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon

Could be. But The Streets clearly are not.

Explosions In The Sky certainly aren't underground.

**Janszoon** · 11-02-2010, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt

Explosions In The Sky certainly aren't underground.

Yeah, neither is Mountain.

11-02-2010, 04:47 AM	#1 (permalink)
mrguy Please, don't feed Mrguy Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 234	How "underground" does a band need to be to...be "underground" Firstly; I put "underground" in quotations, as I don't like it as an adjective for music... But I can't think of a more suitable word at the moment. Anyway, I write a column on a music blog called The Plug (where a plug small, relatively unknown acts who need a little promotion). The first band I did, Battle Circus, had 700 something listeners on last.fm. The band liked my write up, and all the readers seemed to like the music... Anyway, I'm trying to set my guidelines for how "underground" a band needs to be to feature... The next group I'm considering doing have around 7000 plays on last.fm (decided to primarily base in on last.fm listeners), and I thought this was quite a lot. But then there is another group called "sleepmakeswaves" (Australian post-rock) who have one ep and one split ep (no album), and I thought were pretty unheard of. Yet they have 28,000 listeners... So, how many/few listeners is "underground"? Last edited by mrguy; 11-14-2010 at 08:56 PM.

11-02-2010, 05:49 AM	#2 (permalink)
cardboard adolescent ;) Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: CA Posts: 3,503	35786 or less

11-02-2010, 09:53 AM	#4 (permalink)
Iggy Stardust Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 52	what makes the difference between underground and indie??? *my personal opinion of indie is any band that becomes independantly well known without their music being on tv, radio, or advertised at all

11-02-2010, 10:03 AM	#5 (permalink)
ThePhanastasio Killed Laura Palmer Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Ashland, KY Posts: 1,679	Yeah, I don't know if last.fm is the best indicator as to whether or not a band's "underground". A lot of bands still remain unknown of by the general populace, but may get a lot of plays on last.fm because they tend to play in one of the larger metropolitan areas in a given area, and as such, a lot of people in that specific area have heard of them. A better indicator would be to really research the band. What label are they on, or are they still unsigned? Where have they played, and have they been a support act for other unknown bands, or are they a true up-and-coming band, already headlining the bill for shows? How many albums have they released? Things like this are better taken into account than last.fm plays.

11-02-2010, 11:52 AM	#6 (permalink)
~~James~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Scotland Posts: 4,483	At least past the subway.