When Does A Movement Die? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2011, 09:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The North Of England
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
When people with horrible taste in music start listening to them.
This.
Average Cabbage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2011, 09:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
They/Them
 
TockTockTock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,914
Default

I think a certain movement lives on a bit after it "dies." By that, I mean that it lives on in either its influence on music or the still-active musicians affiliated with that particular movement.

But I do agree that the trend theory that has been previously stated is plausible and makes sense.
TockTockTock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 11:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default

That's not quite what I meant but never mind.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 11:10 AM   #4 (permalink)
love will tear you apart
 
TheCunningStunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 5,107
Default

When band's material start to deteriorate and their songwriting isn't as good as it once was and people lose interest could be one reason, or the style of music changes and it isn't the same sound as the music they were making at the start of the movement.
__________________
I don't feel and I feel great.

Last FM
TheCunningStunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2010, 07:05 AM   #5 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Screen13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,388
Default

I usually give things in The US Four Years, or sometimes about Three if Pop Based. It's a bad attempt at an outline of a trend, or movement, but here it is...

This is mainly what I would call my High School Theory-or, is more "Alternative," Community College.

Year One - The rush of excitement that surrounds something that the Hip portion of the media catches and starts to Hot Trend it. This is usually the year that's called when things were for real during the movement's most popular time later on.

Year Two - The difficult Second Year, where all the major outlets get to find out just how this new trend works and see who is with the business. Many of the defining "First Hits" or at least best known songs are found here. The public takes notice.

Year Three - Here is where all of the major hits start to add up more and more. The public that usually waits for things to be big or when established stars pick up on some of the characteristics to look cool and not as out of date as their music still suggests. Either that or when bands who form the "acceptable" wave (In Punk's Case, Power Pop, the early form of New Wave in The States) start to get more notice. This is usually when all of the Avrils start to get their time in the spotlight.

Year Four - The feeling that a New Thing is now a part of history. About half of the older fans no longer look for new bands, unless they look for more Underground or more Serious scenes (This usually happens at College-Level, usually forming part of my Community College "Alternative Music Scene" theory), thinking their music has sold out and is now a part of the soundtrack of their lives...and this is where the search for a new thing (Usually a variation of what happened through the last four years in a new coat) happens. Many sad or interesting albums (or at least singles) by the once-new happen around this time.

Anyone surviving is either very lucky, has met up with the right Producers and Image-Makers..or have seriously considered music to be their calling and continue to gain respect with real music fans who just dig the sounds for what they are.

Time for revisionism of usually sneered at happenings...about 8 years to a decade, The "Oh yeah, I actually like that, I'll admit it" Time Smooths Most Things Theory.

Last edited by Screen13; 07-03-2010 at 07:16 AM.
Screen13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 06:09 AM   #6 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Screen13 View Post
I usually give things in The US Four Years, or sometimes about Three if Pop Based. It's a bad attempt at an outline of a trend, or movement, but here it is...

This is mainly what I would call my High School Theory-or, is more "Alternative," Community College.

Year One - The rush of excitement that surrounds something that the Hip portion of the media catches and starts to Hot Trend it. This is usually the year that's called when things were for real during the movement's most popular time later on.

Year Two - The difficult Second Year, where all the major outlets get to find out just how this new trend works and see who is with the business. Many of the defining "First Hits" or at least best known songs are found here. The public takes notice.

Year Three - Here is where all of the major hits start to add up more and more. The public that usually waits for things to be big or when established stars pick up on some of the characteristics to look cool and not as out of date as their music still suggests. Either that or when bands who form the "acceptable" wave (In Punk's Case, Power Pop, the early form of New Wave in The States) start to get more notice. This is usually when all of the Avrils start to get their time in the spotlight.

Year Four - The feeling that a New Thing is now a part of history. About half of the older fans no longer look for new bands, unless they look for more Underground or more Serious scenes (This usually happens at College-Level, usually forming part of my Community College "Alternative Music Scene" theory), thinking their music has sold out and is now a part of the soundtrack of their lives...and this is where the search for a new thing (Usually a variation of what happened through the last four years in a new coat) happens. Many sad or interesting albums (or at least singles) by the once-new happen around this time.

Anyone surviving is either very lucky, has met up with the right Producers and Image-Makers..or have seriously considered music to be their calling and continue to gain respect with real music fans who just dig the sounds for what they are.

Time for revisionism of usually sneered at happenings...about 8 years to a decade, The "Oh yeah, I actually like that, I'll admit it" Time Smooths Most Things Theory.
very good post
bogey_j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2011, 09:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Raust's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,411
Default

Stereotypical movements such as heavy metal, punk and grunge those movements died when it started to parody themselves. I remember vaguely while growing up that Barbra Walters was doing an interview in Seattle in the mid to early 90's and was decked out in flannel. That was the nail in the coffin for that decade. Metal was perfectly stereotyped in Spinal Tap and brought to a darker light in The Decline of Western Civilization of what was going on at the time. The word movement to is pretty vague. If you're talking about '67 as flower power/psychedelia or '77 the era of punk '85 heavy metal '91 grunge ect. Those "movements" never really died people have taken a great many influences from them to this day and incorporated it in there music. And there's also plenty of revival groups around that do bring back that sound. Granted they're not as popular as they are today.
Raust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2010, 11:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Public Enemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 67
Default

I don't think trends ever really die especially if the fans keep it alive.
__________________
The Gambler, a greater master he is in his art, the worse man he is.
Public Enemy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2010, 11:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Screen13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,388
Default

Especially through the last decade, I can see that more and more. Even though trends still come and go, in a way thanks to better exposure of music, "Movements" have not been as trendy with the exception of those based in Mainstream Pop, and then best of each (No matter if you like the music or not) usually sticks around.

Last edited by Screen13; 07-03-2010 at 01:21 PM. Reason: Adding thoughts
Screen13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2010, 11:19 AM   #10 (permalink)
nothing
 
mr dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
Default

movements don't die. they just lose topical relevance and speed to the youth of the day before being re-appropriated about 10-20 years later as a 'post-' version of its previous self.
__________________
i am the universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1 View Post
I type whicked fast,
mr dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.