What Is Your Definition Of A "Sell Out"? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-16-2010, 08:02 PM   #31 (permalink)
nothing
 
mr dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
This notion that artists should make "pure" art, isolated from the influence of their audience is a pretty recent invention and is kind of at odds with the role of art over the millennia of human history.
i think that stems from the modern attitude that only people who are both creators and performers are legitimate artists. if all you do is one side of that coin then you're some sort of fraud.
__________________
i am the universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1 View Post
I type whicked fast,
mr dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:08 PM   #32 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
keith!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 287
Default

weezer are probably one of the only bands i'd actually call sell outs.
it's probably just because of how much i love pinkterton and blue, but i honestly don't understand how a band that made this can go on to make this.
keith! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:16 PM   #33 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: -_-_-_-_~__~-~_-`_`-~_-`-~-~
Posts: 1,276
Default

I'd consider Rivers Cuomo one of two things -- He's either a sell-out who purposely makes such terrible music now to appeal to twelve-year olds, or he's simply gone through some sort of mental deprivation that makes him think what he's doing is still good. Sell-out or idiot, your choice!
clutnuckle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:19 PM   #34 (permalink)
air quote
 
Engine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Sure. But I'm perfectly happy to simply have an occupation that I not only enjoy but I feel is "my calling" in a way.
And that's really good. I envy everybody who makes real money doing what they feel compelled to do naturally, especially in the arts. If you think about it, that could be more satisfying than making ridiculous amounts of money just because you get noticed by the gallery crowd or whatever. But I do think a lot of creative people get crushed a bit by the realization that they must produce things they have little to no interest in to make a living

Quote:
I see your point, but I think adapting to your audience has been a part of all forms of art since people first started making art. Michelangelo knew that when he was painting the Sistine Chapel. James Brown knew it when he was making music to move butts. This notion that artists should make "pure" art, isolated from the influence of their audience is a pretty recent invention and is kind of at odds with the role of art over the millennia of human history.
y'know I thought about Rembrandt and his school as I was typing what I said. I don't think that his students were not making 'pure' art (don't believe in the concept of purity in general) and I don't romanticize art all that much. Still, I bet a lot of Rembrandts' student wanted to paint something really cool and imaginitive instead of what they had to paint just to make enough money to subsist.

I wonder if cave paintings were made for profit by cavemen who really wanted to paint something different that we have never seen or even imagined
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through.
Engine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:30 PM   #35 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine View Post
I wonder if cave paintings were made for profit by cavemen who really wanted to paint something different that we have never seen or even imagined
I'm willing to bet they at least didn't have to do the hunting or gathering that day. Maybe that was payment enough.

And maybe the ones who got creative are the reason for all those mythological creatures from throughout history.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:30 PM   #36 (permalink)
____
 
FaSho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 5,279
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keith! View Post
can go on to make this.
This is better:


Also, new Weezer isn't that bad. The Red Album especially was just as good as their old stuff.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
What? No. No. No. No no no.
FaSho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:31 PM   #37 (permalink)
air quote
 
Engine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: pollen & mold
Posts: 3,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clutnuckle View Post
I'd consider Rivers Cuomo one of two things -- He's either a sell-out who purposely makes such terrible music now to appeal to twelve-year olds, or he's simply gone through some sort of mental deprivation that makes him think what he's doing is still good. Sell-out or idiot, your choice!
Haha I agree. I actually did love and still love the first Weezer album (although people made fun of me for that even in 1994)

I always wondered what exactly motivates that guy. He's definitely got a knack for making rock songs - but why does he do it that way?
__________________
Like an arrow,
I was only passing through.
Engine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:46 PM   #38 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
keith!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FaSho View Post
Also, new Weezer isn't that bad. The Red Album especially was just as good as their old stuff.
gonna have to strongly disagree with you there, although Red is waaaay better then Make Believe or Raditude.

So people also consider Green Day sellouts? I'm not a big fan of them but from what people tell me American Idiot is pretty highly regarded among Green Day fans. Why are people upset that they are more popular if the quality is still high?
keith! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:46 PM   #39 (permalink)
Quiet Man in the Corner
 
CanwllCorfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pocono Mountains
Posts: 2,480
Default

I don't think I've ever called any band/artist a sell out. I usually just think of it as a term for an artist or band that's left a fan embittered by their new style or popularity.
__________________
Your eyes were never yet let in to see the majesty and riches of the mind, but dwell in darkness; for your God is blind.

CanwllCorfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 08:48 PM   #40 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanwllCorfe View Post
I don't think I've ever called any band/artist a sell out. I usually just think of it as a term for an artist or band that's left a fan embittered by their new style or popularity.
I think I used to call bands sellouts back when I was about 14. Now I just say they suck if I think they suck.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.