General opinion on Greatest Hits and Best Of compilations. - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-10-2010, 04:33 PM   #21 (permalink)
Like a fart in a trance
 
Tea Supremacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chavham. Go on, Wiki it.
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Landon View Post
I've loads of Greatest Hits compilations that I bought when I was younger and just getting into music, but I sort of regret having them now. I never buy them now because I think it sort of ruins listening to the album because you'l have heard the hit songs many times before. For instance I had the Red Hot Chili peppers Greatest Hits for ages and when I got Blood Sugar Sex Magik it wasn't that good because I heard Under the Bridge etc. so many times. So now i generally stay away from them and prefer to get the debut album of what I'm interested in.
Kind of the same. If I hear a few bits and pieces of a band and like the sound of them I'd rather get a couple of their albums first or, at the very least, get on Spotify/Last FM etc rather than buy a greatest hits. I'm in complete agreement with Goblin Tears and his point about the Cure, there's no way you can judge the capacity of the Cure on their Greatest hits. The only thing I like about compilations is the b-sides/remixes/previously unreleased material etc.

Saying that... I have bought greatest hits from a few my favourite Artists (namely Bjork and The Cure :S) purely because it completes my 'hard copy' back catalogue of albums and makes the slightly OCD side of me smile seeing them there, all lined up in order of release... Ahem.
__________________
'You got red on you...'
Tea Supremacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2010, 07:36 PM   #22 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 19
Default

If i'm on the fence about aq band, I usually pick up a best-of. For example, I wasn't sure if I wanted to invest much time into Helmet. I picked up the best-of and I loved it. With Faith No More, I had loved the band for years but their Who Cares Alot? compilation had a whole CD of unreleased stuff.

Sometimes it's a matter of loving a band but it being nice to have all the greats in one place like The Doors, the Beatles, etc.
instereowhereavailable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 05:23 PM   #23 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Upton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 15
Default

I'm not against them - it depends on the band. Like with The Fall I have no idea how to tackle their discography and right now I'm not even interested in exploring much past 50,000 Fall Fans Can't Be Wrong
Upton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 05:32 PM   #24 (permalink)
Take it easy, but take it
 
Hank The Drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 213
Default

With some bands I feel like Greatest Hits and Best Of's are necessary. Some bands released really inconsistent albums and had only certain songs that were good. I know that most of the time GH and BoC's don't manage to list the best songs, but at times they manage to do it.

Some bands were extremely consistent and comps of this type aren't needed for you to get really good material.

I guess I'm just neutral on the topic, I would rather have the full lengths, but sometimes the comps are the best/only thing that you can manage.
__________________
“If a song can't be written in 20 minutes, it ain't worth writing.” - Hank Williams
Hank The Drifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.