|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which format for listening to music do you enjoy most? | |||
Live Music is the Best | 8 | 20.00% | |
Player Pianos | 0 | 0% | |
Edison era Wax Tube | 2 | 5.00% | |
Vinyl/other records | 3 | 7.50% | |
8-Track | 0 | 0% | |
Cassette Tape | 0 | 0% | |
CD | 11 | 27.50% | |
Mp3 Digital | 9 | 22.50% | |
WAV Digital | 1 | 2.50% | |
.Ogg Digital | 1 | 2.50% | |
FLAC Digital | 4 | 10.00% | |
Apple Lossless | 1 | 2.50% | |
Other Lossy (which?) | 0 | 0% | |
Other Lossless (which?) | 0 | 0% | |
MIDI | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-12-2010, 05:30 PM | #11 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
|
I voted for FLAC because when I listen to digital music I prefer it be lossless, and that's the format I usually go for. Most often, though, it's usually MP3s. I hardly ever use CDs but I have on occosion. I miss cassette mixtapes from when I was a kid (yeah we still did it in the late 90s) but that can't make up for the terrible quality.
So... I failed to mention Analog Radio, Internet Radio and Youtube on here. Which are both pretty widely used fo discovering/listening to music. |
04-12-2010, 05:34 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Dazed and confuzzled
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 1,552
|
I would have voted FLAC, it looked like you could do two votes in the old poll, so I thought I could here, lol. I voted CD but FLAC would be first out of the two. I would choose ogg FLAC but you only need that really if you're going to be editing the audio, which I wouldnt be, but you can easily convert between the two any. They're both solid.
__________________
I have acquired four score and nineteen difficulties, but a wench cannot be counted among them |
04-12-2010, 05:36 PM | #13 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Flacs are a waste of HD space in my opinion. If I replaced my entire collection with flacs, well .. it just wouldn't be feasible. It would take far too much space. As such, it's not a practical digital format for me.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
04-12-2010, 05:40 PM | #14 (permalink) |
The Music Guru.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
|
I actually own a player piano with a pretty big collection of rolls. It was all willed to me after my grandma died in the fall. But I've since upgraded to the Edison Wax Tube
Ok, for real now, digital music files. I use iTunes (because I'm too lazy to use anything else) and it's all in the Apple Lossless format. |
04-12-2010, 11:22 PM | #16 (permalink) | ||
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
Quote:
I listen to CDs I like the feature of skip, repeat, random on CD players something record players don't have, but I prefer LPs for sound, dispite thier fault. And you can convert them to mp3 etc.
__________________
Quote:
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
||
04-13-2010, 07:05 AM | #17 (permalink) |
The Music Guru.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
|
Their production peaked when audio recordings became more popular. The one I have was a pneumatic one (where it was powered by these bellow-type things and your feet pushed these big pedals at the bottom), but my grandma had it converted to electricity years ago. So now when you turn it on and put a roll in, the keys are being pressed by nobody. It's freaky and cool at the same time!
|
04-13-2010, 07:21 AM | #18 (permalink) |
thirsty ears
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Boulder
Posts: 742
|
i'm a recent flac convert. for me it's not so much about quality as it is about archiving my collection. i put a ton of effort into sorting and tagging and cataloging my music, and i expect my digital collection to be with me for a long time. but if i want it to grow along with technology, i figure i need the most flexible format possible.
flac is lossless, so it's equal in quality to a CD, and in fact can be used to reproduce the original CD 1:1. it's a free codec, and it is widely supported (even on an iPod if you install the RockBox firmware). as for size - yes, it's big. but today 1TB drives cost less than $100, and 1TB holds a lot of flac. the biggest disadvantage is that flac can be hard to find. but i always enjoy the hunt
__________________
my flac collection |
04-13-2010, 04:31 PM | #19 (permalink) | |
∞
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,792
|
Quote:
I probably will get a new turntable soon but i'm a bit weary of converting vinyl to digital, i'm not really sure what the sound quality of the file would be like. But a lot of new records come with download codes so you can download the digital product as well.
__________________
|
|
|