![]() |
Quote:
this is where the point you're still missing is ---------------> . |
Quote:
|
Somehow we're akin to believing that a musician's poor financial decisions are of a different nature, than anyone else who has poor money management skills. There are urban planners that go out and buy sports cars when they don't have the equity to justify such a decision. There are, I'm sure, plumbers with terrible drug habits that naturally skew there fiscal priorities, as an aside it's fairly likely that they both make more than 30k a year. To be blunt, why do we isolate the case of the musician abusing drugs and making poor financial decisions and try to tenuously relate it to their chosen profession? the music industry and the lifestyle of what I'll loosely refer to as a 'rock star' with replete is pitfalls and dangers, but on the other hand, so is life. The question is "why doesn't a professional musician, specifically, deserve to be paid what he/she's worth?". The answer is they do deserve to be paid the value of their product, and more often than not, they aren't.
|
Quote:
I was only commenting on everyone posting making it sound like we should feel bad for broke musicians who spent all their money on drugs. |
Quote:
|
Capping people's money? The government shouldn't be deciding how much people can make. This is America bud, we were built on oppurtunity and freedom. If you want the government telling everybody how to spend their money, move to Europe.
|
Quote:
|
Why would you move to Europe for that when it's predominately capitalist?
You know I actually feel sorry for some of the American members of the boards having the rest of the world think you're as un-educated & ill informed as this person seems to be. |
Quote:
Anyway, I think everybody knows Europeans can't get rich as easily as they can in America. Sweden's taxes are like 80 something percent. Why should the government get to decide how much someone can make? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.