|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-25-2010, 09:10 AM | #31 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
I've noticed most of you people are overthinking things. Bands that are still going to be talked about in 25 yrs are the ones that simply made their mark before breaking up. The ones that will be actually be remembered: Muse, Coldplay, Kings of Leon, Radiohead, Queens of the Stone Age, The Mars Volta, Red Hot Chili Peppers, etc. etc. There just isn't room in history books for the losers.
__________________
first.am |
|
02-25-2010, 09:19 AM | #32 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
|
|
02-25-2010, 09:24 AM | #33 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
When you think of the Beatles, do you think of the years 1960-1962?
__________________
first.am |
|
02-25-2010, 09:41 AM | #36 (permalink) |
art is sold for money
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 730
|
OMG, if people start talking about The Hives and Arctic Monkeys in 25 years, I will kill myself...
__________________
Last.fm The Music I make http://www.indabamusic.com/opportuni...missions/52856 |
02-25-2010, 09:42 AM | #37 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
Apples and oranges. First of all, the the Beatles lasted only one decade as band while RHCP are going on their third. Like I said before, the Stones the 80s would be a more accurate comparison. Or maybe Aerosmith in the 90s, Pink Floyd in the 80s, something along those lines. Also, the Beatles didn't release any albums at all during the time period you're talking about, unlike the Chili Peppers, who prior to the 00s had already released 7 LPs, most of which sold extremely well. |
|
02-25-2010, 09:42 AM | #38 (permalink) | ||
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
Yeah, they won't see the light of day in five years, let alone twenty-five. Quote:
__________________
first.am |
||
02-25-2010, 09:54 AM | #39 (permalink) |
FUNky
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
|
I actually agree with lucifer_sam here, Janszoon, and you know me to prefer RHCP BSSM and earlier. But their popularity peaked a couple years ago with 'Dani California' and 'Snow'. If you ask anyone from my generation about the Chili Peppers, you are much more likely to hear about songs from their last three albums than their first three, possibly even more famous than their biggest hit, 'Under the Bridge'. The proof is in the pudding:
Red Hot Chili Peppers’s Charts – Discover music, videos, concerts, & pictures at Last.fm Other than 'Higher Ground', after quickly glancing over that list I don't see another 80s Chili Peppers song until 'Knock Me Down' at #83. The majority seems to be from the last ten years... |
02-25-2010, 09:58 AM | #40 (permalink) | |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
|
Quote:
The jury is out on the Strokes, for me anyhow. I like what they do, but what they do is starting to come off like a one-trick pony. Thats fine, but its like Ac/Dc where they have a couple songs people really like and then its just filler for the live show. Your other three suggestions; Black Keys, White Stripes, and QotSA are likely contenders for endurance. I think most will be recalled by the dedicated few as i don't see any becoming the next U2.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
|
|