|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-04-2021, 11:52 AM | #1011 (permalink) | |
.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,007
|
Quote:
What’s a “BTS”? |
|
11-04-2021, 11:56 AM | #1012 (permalink) |
Call me Mustard
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
|
By 1981, I was quite aware of Ellington. I was not aware of Whiteman and I'm pretty certain no one around me, including my parents, were either. I mean, if you're a fan of Paul Whiteman, that's okay.
But it's a stretch to put Whiteman in the same category of some of his contemporaries like Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, Rudy Vallee, and yes, Bing Crosby, artists of the same period that I did hear of. |
11-04-2021, 12:03 PM | #1015 (permalink) |
.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,007
|
I told you that he was second only to Ellington in popularity at that time, so, yeah, all kinds of people knew about him. You keep putting in these artists that were not really all that popular in the late 20s to make your point.
You (should) know exactly what I meant about the reference to “I saw all these singers on my TV back then, so…” |
11-04-2021, 12:08 PM | #1018 (permalink) |
Call me Mustard
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
|
Okay, so now you're talking about popularity. I bet if you take a poll on who would be remembered from that period (and I realize Whiteman had his share of big hits in the 1920s and 1930s), I bet you would hear more votes for Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington than you would for Paul Whiteman.
Anyway, if there is a young person who hasn't heard of the Beatles (or the Rolling Stones for that matter), it isn't the end of the world. Have to go now, but really appreciated the discussion, rotasi. Yeah, as far as that K-Pop band, I only know of them from a couple late night appearances. Not really my thing |
|