Music Banter Hall Of Fame: Nominations Thread

[boo boo]

Originally Posted by S. Flavious Mercurius

My question would be why they deserve to be in before Oasis?

Because Blur are awesome and Oasis are horrible?

I think that might have something to do with it.

[S. Flavious Mercurius]

Originally Posted by boo boo

Because Blur are awesome and Oasis are horrible?

I think that might have something to do with it.

That's so absurd, Oasis is so much more relevant in America and I like them way better and I'm sure the average person does.

Plus Blur is pretty average compared to the bands already inducted

[Akira]

Originally Posted by S. Flavious Mercurius

That's so absurd, Oasis is so much more relevant in America and I like them way better and I'm sure the average person does.

Plus Blur is pretty average compared to the bands already inducted

No offense but F*CK AMERICA AND THE BUBBLE YOU LIVE IN.

[S. Flavious Mercurius]

Originally Posted by ToeAndno

No offense but F*CK AMERICA AND THE BUBBLE YOU LIVE IN.

Lots of offense intended here, Fuck you too.

Nothing to do with me being in a bubble, go back to Nirvana nomination and watch all the Brits knocking them for being irrelvent across the pond. My favorite bands are the Who and Zeppelin, I'm not in a bubble.

[someonecompletelyrandom]

I don't think we should argue over why we vote yes or no. Truth be told if we really like somebody then we are going to vote Yes, no matter what influence, impact, whatever, they may have had.

If we really don't like somebody, than we are going to vote No. I've seen people change their tactics back and forth on this thread, and it all has to do with them wanting who they like to get it.

Whether you personally decide to vote Yes or No is up to you. There is no standard to go on. You could sit there and tell me "I'm voting NO because they didn't have a very big impact" but what you are really saying is "I'm voting NO because I don't like them".

[Urban Hat€monger ?]

Originally Posted by S. Flavious Mercurius

Lots of offense intended here, Fuck you too.

Nothing to do with me being in a bubble, go back to Nirvana nomination and watch all the Brits knocking them for being irrelvent across the pond.

I just did, of the people who posted 2 Americans said they voted no (anticipation & Zombie Fetish) And one half Brit did (Me).

And mine had nothing to do with where they were from.

[crash_override]

Originally Posted by ToeAndno

No offense but F*CK AMERICA AND THE BUBBLE YOU LIVE IN.

That doesn't change the fact that both bands suck equally and neither deserve to be in.

[boo boo]

Originally Posted by S. Flavious Mercurius

That's so absurd, Oasis is so much more relevant in America and I like them way better and I'm sure the average person does.

Plus Blur is pretty average compared to the bands already inducted

Why in the hell should a british band that is quite successful in their own country give two sh*ts about being successful in America? A lot of big british bands aren't big over here, seriously, what are you saying? that it only counts if a band is successful in American, isn't completely changing the music scene of one country freaking good enough?

And to be successful in America, how much of an achievement is that really? What have they achieved in America that was in anyway positive? Well lets see, Oasis are now logjammed in adult contemporary radio where they will forever remain, playing alongside Hootie & The Blowfish and Savage Garden, congratulations Noel.