|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Does John Peel deserve to make the Hall of Fame? | |||
Yes | 11 | 91.67% | |
No | 1 | 8.33% | |
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-04-2009, 11:35 PM | #1861 (permalink) |
Untalented Drummer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sussex, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,900
|
I think it should be a balance of musical importance and personal taste...
__________________
"If you're like me, then it's possible you're a clone generated from my stolen DNA. I suggest you turn yourself in for destruction immediately" - Shaun Micallef. |
08-04-2009, 11:45 PM | #1862 (permalink) |
we are stardust
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
|
No, I agree with you. I think the Hall of Fame should be about musical importance over whether you like a band personally. I like Blur. I haven't based any of my decisions on my personal interest of a band, but instead their influence/ importance in music history. I'm just undecided and yet to make a decision of whether Blur have that influence and importance in music, enough to be included in the Hall of Fame.
|
08-05-2009, 12:14 AM | #1864 (permalink) | |
Barely Disheveled Zombie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,196
|
Quote:
|
|
08-05-2009, 12:22 AM | #1865 (permalink) | |
we are stardust
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
|
Quote:
|
|
08-05-2009, 12:23 AM | #1866 (permalink) |
Untalented Drummer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sussex, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,900
|
Well they got me into a whole realm of new music I'd have probably never touched if it weren't for hearing their stuff.... so I guess on those grounds, I have a very justified yes vote!
__________________
"If you're like me, then it's possible you're a clone generated from my stolen DNA. I suggest you turn yourself in for destruction immediately" - Shaun Micallef. |
08-05-2009, 12:33 AM | #1867 (permalink) | |
Barely Disheveled Zombie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,196
|
Quote:
In your example, most of the people spouting 'But look at their influence' are by the people who actually genuinely like the band, and are looking for a reason for people to vote similarly beyond personal preference. EDIT - Or else you get a situation that people were complaining about before... Only the Sacred Cows making into the HoF, and no one of interest or variation making it through. |
|
08-05-2009, 10:18 AM | #1869 (permalink) | |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Quote:
Believe me, that's not what it's about at all. |
|
08-05-2009, 10:21 AM | #1870 (permalink) |
Dazed and confuzzled
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 1,552
|
I don't say yes just because I like a band or artist. It has to be more than that for me to enter them into a Hall of Fame. There's been some I've been a big fan of but voted no for that reason and I'm sure plenty more.
I've nominated someone who would get into any hall of fame but I predict he won't on this forum. Just have to wait and see.
__________________
I have acquired four score and nineteen difficulties, but a wench cannot be counted among them |
|